These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21059594)

  • 1. Use of historical data and a novel metric in the evaluation of the effectiveness of hearing conservation program components.
    Heyer N; Morata TC; Pinkerton LE; Brueck SE; Stancescu D; Panaccio MP; Kim H; Sinclair JS; Waters MA; Estill CF; Franks JR
    Occup Environ Med; 2011 Jul; 68(7):510-7. PubMed ID: 21059594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and application of a noise-hazard scheme for road maintainers.
    Cavallari JM; Garza JL; DiFrancesco J; Dugan AG; Walker ED
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 May; 63(5):429-434. PubMed ID: 31953973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers.
    Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Kirsche SR; Cullen MR; Slade MD; Dixon-Ernst C
    Occup Environ Med; 2011 Jun; 68(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 21193566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tikka C; Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Ferrite S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006396. PubMed ID: 28685503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program.
    Brink LL; Talbott EO; Burks JA; Palmer CV
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 12486782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort?
    Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Dixon-Ernst C; Slade MD; Cullen MR
    Occup Environ Med; 2007 Jan; 64(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16973736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of a daily noise monitoring intervention for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Rabinowitz P; Galusha D; Cantley LF; Dixon-Ernst C; Neitzel R
    Occup Environ Med; 2021 Nov; 78(11):835-840. PubMed ID: 34215684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan.
    Reilly MJ; Rosenman KD; Kalinowski DJ
    J Occup Environ Med; 1998 Aug; 40(8):667-74. PubMed ID: 9729748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness: Results of a Multisite Assessment.
    Rabinowitz P; Cantley LF; Galusha D; Trufan S; Swersey A; Dixon-Ernst C; Ramirez V; Neitzel R
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Jan; 60(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29309362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise-Induced hearing loss among professional musicians.
    Pouryaghoub G; Mehrdad R; Pourhosein S
    J Occup Health; 2017 Jan; 59(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 27853057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later.
    Suter AH
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):2-7. PubMed ID: 19265247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workers.
    McTague MF; Galusha D; Dixon-Ernst C; Kirsche SR; Slade MD; Cullen MR; Rabinowitz PM
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-8. PubMed ID: 23373740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise exposure to airline ramp employees.
    Tubbs RL
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Sep; 15(9):657-63. PubMed ID: 10983395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Costs and effectiveness of hearing conservation programs at 14 US metal manufacturing facilities.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Cantley LF; Galusha D; Neitzel RL
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S3-S11. PubMed ID: 29216778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiometric data analysis for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: A new approach.
    Craner J
    Am J Ind Med; 2022 May; 65(5):409-424. PubMed ID: 35289946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    Mil Med; 1993 Nov; 158(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 8284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.