445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21059664)
1. Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Horng YS
Clin Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 25(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 21059664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Lee SD; Hong WH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1281-7. PubMed ID: 21807147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale.
Lin KC; Fu T; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Chen CL; Lee PC
Qual Life Res; 2010 Apr; 19(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 20127418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation.
Lin KC; Chuang LL; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Chang WY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 20848369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel].
Schlote A; Krüger J; Topp H; Wallesch CW
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Apr; 43(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15100916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a short version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale in patients receiving rehabilitation.
Chen HF; Wu CY; Lin KC; Li MW; Yu HW
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Jul; 44(8):629-36. PubMed ID: 22729789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of psychometric properties of the smart balance master system and the postural assessment scale for stroke in people who have had mild stroke.
Chien CW; Hu MH; Tang PF; Sheu CF; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 88(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 17321832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation.
Li KY; Lin KC; Wang TN; Wu CY; Huang YH; Ouyang P
NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 30(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22672940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and Responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment for Outcome Evaluation in Stroke Rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Chuang IC; Ma HI; Lin KC; Chen CL
Am J Occup Ther; 2016; 70(2):7002290040p1-8. PubMed ID: 26943116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke.
Chen MH; Hsieh CL; Mao HF; Huang SL
Clin Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 21(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 17613576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
Chen P; Lin KC; Liing RJ; Wu CY; Chen CL; Chang KC
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1585-96. PubMed ID: 26714699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke.
Chen HL; Lin KC; Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Liing RJ; Chen CL
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28580791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing activities of daily living in outpatients with stroke.
Hsueh IP; Chen JH; Wang CH; Hou WH; Hsieh CL
Phys Ther; 2013 May; 93(5):681-93. PubMed ID: 23329557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and responsiveness of the activities of daily living computerized adaptive testing system in patients with stroke.
Lee YC; Yu WH; Lin YF; Hsueh IP; Wu HC; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 95(11):2055-63. PubMed ID: 24845220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients.
Hsieh CL; Sheu CF; Hsueh IP; Wang CH
Stroke; 2002 Nov; 33(11):2626-30. PubMed ID: 12411652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke.
Wang TN; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chung CY; Pei YC; Teng YK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1086-91. PubMed ID: 21704789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smallest real difference of 2 instrumental activities of daily living measures in patients with chronic stroke.
Lu WS; Chen CC; Huang SL; Hsieh CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1097-100. PubMed ID: 22475058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the streamlined Wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Fu T; Lin KC; Feng CT; Hsieh KP; Yu HW; Lin CH; Hsieh CJ; Ota H
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Feb; 25(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20947494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
