These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21060140)

  • 1. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J; Epstein M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):981-94. PubMed ID: 21060140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Vibrotactile Stimulation on Auditory Timbre Perception for Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Verma T; Aker SC; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221138390. PubMed ID: 36789758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).
    Zhu M; Chen B; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3562-5. PubMed ID: 22225012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Choi JE; Won JH; Kim CH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):800. PubMed ID: 29335454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones.
    Caclin A; McAdams S; Smith BK; Winsberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):471-82. PubMed ID: 16119366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal and spectral contributions to musical instrument identification and discrimination among cochlear implant users.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Fullmer T; Crane A; Stoddard T; Runge CL
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 2(3):148-156. PubMed ID: 29204560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.