These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21060906)

  • 1. Clinical inquiries. How does electronic fetal heart rate monitoring affect labor and delivery outcomes?
    Barstow C; Gauer R; Jamieson B
    J Fam Pract; 2010 Nov; 59(11):653a-b. PubMed ID: 21060906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Continuous monitoring of the fetus using an ultrasonic-Doppler-device during delivery].
    Strijowa NW
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(16):1053-4. PubMed ID: 726724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fetal heart rate collaborative practice project: situational awareness in electronic fetal monitoring-a Kaiser Permanente Perinatal Patient Safety Program Initiative.
    MacEachin SR; Lopez CM; Powell KJ; Corbett NL
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 23(4):314-23; quiz 324-5. PubMed ID: 19915414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ST segment analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring, Part I: background, physiology, and interpretation.
    Belfort MA; Saade GR
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):143-57, vii. PubMed ID: 21353095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
    Garite TJ; Dildy GA; McNamara H; Nageotte MP; Boehm FH; Dellinger EH; Knuppel RA; Porreco RP; Miller HS; Sunderji S; Varner MW; Swedlow DB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 11084540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Delivery methods for infants weighing less than 2500 grams. Labor surveillance in cases of vaginal delivery].
    Carbonne B; Tsatsaris V; Cudeville C; Lejeune V; Jannet D; Milliez J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(2 Suppl):307-10. PubMed ID: 10049019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: a standardized approach to management.
    Miller DA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 21278498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ST segment analysis (STAN) as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring, Part II: clinical studies and future directions.
    Belfort MA; Saade GR
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):159-67, vii. PubMed ID: 21353096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Disputes and history of fetal heart monitoring].
    Dueñas-García OF; Díaz-Sotomayor M
    Rev Invest Clin; 2011; 63(6):659-63. PubMed ID: 23650679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment to article: fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon.
    Thoulon JM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Oct; 21(10):760. PubMed ID: 19012194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interpretation of the fetal heart rate in pregnancy and labor].
    Künzel W; Hohmann M
    Gynakologe; 1984 Dec; 17(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 6519556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety.
    Miller DA; Miller LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 206(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 22000897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic fetal monitoring: implications for obstetrical nursing.
    Applegate J; Haverkamp AD; Orleans M; Taylor C
    Nurs Res; 1979; 28(6):369-71. PubMed ID: 258806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Monitoring labor with cardiotocography and stethoscopic examination in normal and risk deliveries].
    Neldam S; Osler M; Hansen PK; Nim J; Smith SF; Hertel J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1985 Sep; 147(37):2901-7. PubMed ID: 3901456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methods of adequate evaluation of the fetal status in modern delivery room].
    Marinova N; Marinska M; Nikolov A; Pavlova E
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45 Suppl 3():20-3. PubMed ID: 18240718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ST analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring: an overview.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Miller LA
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20697240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Complex, intensive observation of the state of the fetus during the labor process].
    Petrikovskiĭ BM; Barmin AA; Darkova LB
    Sov Med; 1980; (8):70-4. PubMed ID: 7423245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Monitoring of labor by fetal pulse oximetry in a case of fetal atrial-ventricular block].
    Boudineau M; Fondevila M; Winer N; Caroit Y; Boog G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(3):321-3. PubMed ID: 9265056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.