These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21061415)

  • 1. Mixed models for data from thorough QT studies: part 2. One-step assessment of conditional QT prolongation.
    Schall R
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 21061415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed models for data from thorough QT studies: part 1. assessment of marginal QT prolongation.
    Schall R; Ring A
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 21574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical characterization of QT prolongation.
    Schall R; Ring A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):543-62. PubMed ID: 20358435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical analysis methods for QT/QTc prolongation.
    Ma H; Smith B; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 18470763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A statistical assessment of QT data following placebo and moxifloxacin dosing in thorough QT studies.
    Stylianou A; Roger J; Stephens K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):502-16. PubMed ID: 18470759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a thorough QTc study necessary? The role of modeling and simulation in evaluating the QTc prolongation potential of drugs.
    Rohatagi S; Carrothers TJ; Kuwabara-Wagg J; Khariton T
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 49(11):1284-96. PubMed ID: 19734373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical assessment of QT/QTc prolongation based on maximum of correlated normal random variables.
    Cheng B; Chow SC; Burt D; Cosmatos D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 18470758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The preclinical assessment of the risk for QT interval prolongation.
    Champeroux P; Martel E; Vannier C; Blanc V; Leguennec JY; Fowler J; Richard S
    Therapie; 2000; 55(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 10860008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The heart rate-corrected QT interval of conscious beagle dogs: a formula based on analysis of covariance.
    Spence S; Soper K; Hoe CM; Coleman J
    Toxicol Sci; 1998 Oct; 45(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 9848132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An efficient analysis of covariance model for crossover thorough QT studies with period-specific baseline days.
    Lu K
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):192-200. PubMed ID: 23625584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. QT analysis: a complex answer to a 'simple' problem.
    Li L; Desai M; Desta Z; Flockhart D
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2625-43. PubMed ID: 15316947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of missing data on type 1 error rates in non-inferiority trials.
    Yoo B
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19408241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences between study-specific and subject-specific heart rate corrections of the QT interval in investigations of drug induced QTc prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):791-800. PubMed ID: 15189536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records.
    van der Werf JH; Goddard ME; Meyer K
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Dec; 81(12):3300-8. PubMed ID: 9891276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some general estimation methods for nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Davidian M; Giltinan DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1993 Mar; 3(1):23-55. PubMed ID: 8485535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting a linear mixed model for longitudinal data: repeated measures analysis of variance, covariance pattern model, and growth curve approaches.
    Liu S; Rovine MJ; Molenaar PC
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 22251268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.