336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21061801)
21. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Matthews KS; Rocconi RP; Case AS; Estes JM; Straughn JM; Huh WK
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 17415109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings.
Szurkus DC; Harrison TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1180-2. PubMed ID: 12748471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures in Israel.
Siegler E; Bornstein J;
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 21829002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for conization of the uterine cervix.
Chen RJ; Chang DY; Yen ML; Chow SN; Huang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1994 Mar; 93(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 7920057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Treats Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2/3 Among HIV- and HIV+ Women in Kenya.
Orang'o O; Mehta N; Itsura P; Tonui P; Bussmann H; Bogers JP; Liu T; Cu-Uvin S
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 31860571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increase in the cervical length after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Akashi K; Suzuki Y; Konno R; Motomatsu S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 27924675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Kim SI; Kim SJ; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 31(2):e13. PubMed ID: 31912671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kjellberg L; Tavelin B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(9):1140-4. PubMed ID: 17712659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Four categories of LEEP for CIN of various areas: a retrospective cohort study.
Yin G; Li J; Wu A; Liang J; Yuan Z
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 27652670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of anaesthesia mode on evaluation of LEEP specimen dimensions.
Mercuzot A; Chevreau J; Sevestre H; Muszynski C; Arbyn M; Sergent F; Gondry J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 46(4):339-342. PubMed ID: 28643661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance.
Witt BL; Factor RE; Jarboe EA; Layfield LJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Oct; 136(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 23020732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
