These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21062764)

  • 61. TIPP: taxonomic identification and phylogenetic profiling.
    Nguyen NP; Mirarab S; Liu B; Pop M; Warnow T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3548-55. PubMed ID: 25359891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Taxometer: Improving taxonomic classification of metagenomics contigs.
    Kutuzova S; Nielsen M; Piera P; Nissen JN; Rasmussen S
    Nat Commun; 2024 Sep; 15(1):8357. PubMed ID: 39333501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Further steps in TANGO: improved taxonomic assignment in metagenomics.
    Alonso-Alemany D; Barré A; Beretta S; Bonizzoni P; Nikolski M; Valiente G
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23645816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. DiScRIBinATE: a rapid method for accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences.
    Ghosh TS; Monzoorul Haque M; Mande SS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S14. PubMed ID: 21106121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. MAC-ErrorReads: machine learning-assisted classifier for filtering erroneous NGS reads.
    Sami A; El-Metwally S; Rashad MZ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):61. PubMed ID: 38321434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Combining gene prediction methods to improve metagenomic gene annotation.
    Yok NG; Rosen GL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():20. PubMed ID: 21232129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Pseudoalignment for metagenomic read assignment.
    Schaeffer L; Pimentel H; Bray N; Melsted P; Pachter L
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):2082-2088. PubMed ID: 28334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Practical application of self-organizing maps to interrelate biodiversity and functional data in NGS-based metagenomics.
    Weber M; Teeling H; Huang S; Waldmann J; Kassabgy M; Fuchs BM; Klindworth A; Klockow C; Wichels A; Gerdts G; Amann R; Glöckner FO
    ISME J; 2011 May; 5(5):918-28. PubMed ID: 21160538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Correcting the Estimation of Viral Taxa Distributions in Next-Generation Sequencing Data after Applying Artificial Neural Networks.
    Kohls M; Kircher M; Krepel J; Liebig P; Jung K
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Analyzing taxonomic classification using extensible Markov models.
    Kotamarti RM; Hahsler M; Raiford D; McGee M; Dunham MH
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(18):2235-41. PubMed ID: 20624777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A de novo metagenomic assembly program for shotgun DNA reads.
    Lai B; Ding R; Li Y; Duan L; Zhu H
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(11):1455-62. PubMed ID: 22495746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju.
    Menzel P; Ng KL; Krogh A
    Nat Commun; 2016 Apr; 7():11257. PubMed ID: 27071849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. MTSv: rapid alignment-based taxonomic classification and high-confidence metagenomic analysis.
    Furstenau TN; Schneider T; Shaffer I; Vazquez AJ; Sahl J; Fofanov V
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14292. PubMed ID: 36389404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. DUDes: a top-down taxonomic profiler for metagenomics.
    Piro VC; Lindner MS; Renard BY
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(15):2272-80. PubMed ID: 27153591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Benchmarking bacterial taxonomic classification using nanopore metagenomics data of several mock communities.
    Van Uffelen A; Posadas A; Roosens NHC; Marchal K; De Keersmaecker SCJ; Vanneste K
    Sci Data; 2024 Aug; 11(1):864. PubMed ID: 39127718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Meta-QC-Chain: comprehensive and fast quality control method for metagenomic data.
    Zhou Q; Su X; Jing G; Ning K
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 12(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24508279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples.
    Gweon HS; Shaw LP; Swann J; De Maio N; AbuOun M; Niehus R; Hubbard ATM; Bowes MJ; Bailey MJ; Peto TEA; Hoosdally SJ; Walker AS; Sebra RP; Crook DW; Anjum MF; Read DS; Stoesser N;
    Environ Microbiome; 2019 Oct; 14(1):7. PubMed ID: 33902704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Genometa--a fast and accurate classifier for short metagenomic shotgun reads.
    Davenport CF; Neugebauer J; Beckmann N; Friedrich B; Kameri B; Kokott S; Paetow M; Siekmann B; Wieding-Drewes M; Wienhöfer M; Wolf S; Tümmler B; Ahlers V; Sprengel F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41224. PubMed ID: 22927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Guidelines to Statistical Analysis of Microbial Composition Data Inferred from Metagenomic Sequencing.
    Odintsova V; Tyakht A; Alexeev D
    Curr Issues Mol Biol; 2017; 24():17-36. PubMed ID: 28686566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Unsupervised two-way clustering of metagenomic sequences.
    Prabhakara S; Acharya R
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2012; 2012():153647. PubMed ID: 22577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.