These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21062945)

  • 1. Dimensional stability in composite cone beam computed tomography.
    Kopp S; Ottl P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):512-6. PubMed ID: 21062945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):707-30, v. PubMed ID: 18805225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
    Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
    Chen Z; Chen D; Tang L; Wang F
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marker-less assessment of the geometric error of fused cone-beam computed tomography images of the foot constructed using stitching software.
    Wellenberg RH; Dobbe JG; Erkkilä J; Maas M; Streekstra GJ
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Oct; 62(10):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 33040567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam CT in dental practice.
    Dawood A; Patel S; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jul; 207(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19590551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
    Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
    Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
    Samaras CD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obstacles in spatial evaluation of CBCT-reformatted panoramic imaging.
    Wikner J; Friedrich RE; Rashad A; Schulze D; Hanken H; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Riecke B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150436. PubMed ID: 26959644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art.
    Pauwels R; Araki K; Siewerdsen JH; Thongvigitmanee SS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140224. PubMed ID: 25263643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.