221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21066980)
1. The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer. A single center experience.
Popescu I; Vasilescu C; Tomulescu V; Vasile S; Sgarbura O
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2010; 57(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 21066980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Hellan M; Anderson C; Ellenhorn JD; Paz B; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3168-73. PubMed ID: 17763911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases.
Stănciulea O; Eftimie M; David L; Tomulescu V; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 23618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study.
Kwak JM; Kim SH; Kim J; Son DN; Baek SJ; Cho JS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 21228661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population.
Fernandez R; Anaya DA; Li LT; Orcutt ST; Balentine CJ; Awad SA; Berger DH; Albo DA; Artinyan A
Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 23809672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery.
Kim CN; Bae SU; Lee SG; Yang SH; Hyun IG; Jang JH; Cho BS; Park JS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Apr; 31(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 26956581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients].
Gao GM; Chen L; Tang HC; Zhu WQ; Huang ZX; Wang DD; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 24(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 33461255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
Hellan M; Ouellette J; Lagares-Garcia JA; Rauh SM; Kennedy HL; Nicholson JD; Nesbitt D; Johnson CS; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 25487966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperineal minimally invasive abdomino-perineal resection: preliminary outcomes and future perspectives.
Arolfo S; Bullano A; Allaix ME; Arezzo A; Morino M
Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 31734881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
Bilgin IA; Bas M; Aytac E; Benlice C; Esen E; Kirbiyik E; Kiziltas C; Aghayeva A; Ozben V; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T; Baca B
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Dec; 16(6):1-10. PubMed ID: 32920968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
