These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2106700)
41. Medical ethics committees--the decision is yours. Ferguson CG Dimens Health Serv; 1984 Sep; 61(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 6489651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Improving the peer review process: develop a professional review committee for better and quicker results. Agee C Healthc Exec; 2007; 22(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 17523355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. From identification and review to action--maternal mortality review in the United States. Berg CJ Semin Perinatol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 22280859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Do you understand your risk? Liability and third-party evaluations in civil litigation. Gold LH; Davidson JE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 17592166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The need for national pregnancy mortality surveillance. Atrash HK; Ellerbrock TV; Hogue CJ; Smith JC Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 2539303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. California court refuses to extend protection of medical staff information outside the realm of committee setting. Riley SM Health Matrix; 1986; 4(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10324441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A report on the activities of the New Haven County Medical Association Committee on Physician Health. Lyons WB; Harney AW; Freberg GW Conn Med; 1990 Dec; 54(12):671-3. PubMed ID: 2282800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions. Orentlicher D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Professional oversight of physician expert witnesses: an analysis of complaints to the Professional Conduct Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 1992-2006. Kesselheim AS; Studdert DM Ann Surg; 2009 Jan; 249(1):168-72. PubMed ID: 19106694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bioethical review committees in perinatology. Fleischman AR Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):379-93. PubMed ID: 3595059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings. Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Liability for peer review. Johnson LJ Med Econ; 2002 Aug; 79(16):80. PubMed ID: 12226893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [American judge preserves confidentiality in the peer review process]. Overbeke AJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jul; 152(28):1555-6. PubMed ID: 18712221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Controversial committees. Problem-solving groups walk a thin line between open communication and the law. Sherer JL Hosp Health Netw; 1994 May; 68(10):64, 66-7. PubMed ID: 8173604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. History of the Study Committee of the Wisconsin Maternal Mortality Survey. Leonard TA Wis Med J; 1976 Sep; 75(9):29-32. PubMed ID: 788355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Hospital-based professional assistance committees: literature review and guidelines. White RK; Schwartz RP; McDuff DR; Hartmann PM Md Med J; 1992 Apr; 41(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1569838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The impact of state maternal mortality study committees on maternal deaths in the United States. Grimes DA; Cates W Am J Public Health; 1977 Sep; 67(9):830-3. PubMed ID: 900321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]