117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21067288)
1. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
Vadnais MA; Golen TH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
Chez BF; Baird SM
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On NICHD workshops I (1997) and II (2008) on electronic fetal monitoring.
Harvey CJ; Witcher PS
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 38(3):255-7. PubMed ID: 19538611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions.
Epstein AJ; Twogood S; Lee RH; Opper N; Beavis A; Miller DA
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 23161350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fetal heart rate collaborative practice project: situational awareness in electronic fetal monitoring-a Kaiser Permanente Perinatal Patient Safety Program Initiative.
MacEachin SR; Lopez CM; Powell KJ; Corbett NL
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 23(4):314-23; quiz 324-5. PubMed ID: 19915414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1385-90. PubMed ID: 9423739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic fetal monitoring. Are we meeting documentation standards?
Hankins GD; Leicht T; Anderson GD; Rowe TF
J Reprod Med; 1999 May; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 10360257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the predictive ability for perinatal acidemia in neonates between the NICHD 3-tier FHR system combined with clinical risk factors and the fetal reserve index.
Pruksanusak N; Chainarong N; Boripan S; Geater A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276451. PubMed ID: 36264912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: applying principles of patient safety.
Miller DA; Miller LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 206(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 22000897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.
Beaulieu MJ
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19104315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrapartum fetal heart rate definitions and interpretation: evolving consensus.
Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21278497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns before cesarean delivery. Compliance with ACOG recommendations.
Hendrix NW; Chauhan SP; Scardo JA; Ellings JM; Devoe LD
J Reprod Med; 2000 Dec; 45(12):995-9. PubMed ID: 11153261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National standardization of fetal monitoring terminology and competency validation: a call for interdisciplinary collaboration.
Vogler JH
J Perinatol; 1997; 17(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 9210081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic fetal monitoring.
Tallon RW
Nurs Manage; 1996 Jun; 27(6):49-51. PubMed ID: 8788789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
