These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21067634)

  • 1. Is it worth paying more for emergency hormonal contraception? The cost-effectiveness of ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel 1.5 mg.
    Thomas CM; Schmid R; Cameron S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2010 Oct; 36(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 21067634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The price of emergency contraception in the United States: what is the cost-effectiveness of ulipristal acetate versus single-dose levonorgestrel?
    Bayer LL; Edelman AB; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
    Contraception; 2013 Mar; 87(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 23040122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.
    Bellows BK; Tak CR; Sanders JN; Turok DK; Schwarz EB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):508.e1-508.e9. PubMed ID: 29409847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ulipristal acetate: review of the efficacy and safety of a newly approved agent for emergency contraception.
    Richardson AR; Maltz FN
    Clin Ther; 2012 Jan; 34(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 22154199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel emergency contraception among current oral contraceptive users: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Bullard KA; Edelman AB; Williams SM; Rodriguez MI
    Contraception; 2019 Sep; 100(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 31102631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can we reduce costs and prevent more unintended pregnancies? A cost of illness and cost-effectiveness study comparing two methods of EHC.
    Thomas CM; Cameron S
    BMJ Open; 2013 Dec; 3(12):e003815. PubMed ID: 24353255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emergency contraception.
    Gemzell-Danielsson K; Rabe T; Cheng L
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Mar; 29 Suppl 1():1-14. PubMed ID: 23437846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France.
    Schmid R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138990. PubMed ID: 26422259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Emergency contraception: efficacy difference between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate depending on the follicular size at the time of an unprotected sexual intercourse].
    Jamin C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 25703406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency Contraception.
    Batur P; Kransdorf LN; Casey PM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2016 Jun; 91(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 27261868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevention of unintended pregnancies by using emergency contraception: the differences between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate. A theoretical model using data from a survey on the use of emergency contraception in Spain, 2017.
    Lete I; Doval JL; Pérez-Campos E; Alonso MJ; Sellers G; Sánchez-Borrego R
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019 Jul; 35(7):582-585. PubMed ID: 30614295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.
    Glasier AF; Cameron ST; Fine PM; Logan SJ; Casale W; Van Horn J; Sogor L; Blithe DL; Scherrer B; Mathe H; Jaspart A; Ulmann A; Gainer E
    Lancet; 2010 Feb; 375(9714):555-62. PubMed ID: 20116841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ulipristal - a new emergency contraceptive pill.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2010 Aug; 48(8):86-8. PubMed ID: 20685898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ulipristal acetate: a new emergency contraceptive that is safe and more effective than levonorgestrel.
    Fine PM
    Womens Health (Lond); 2011 Jan; 7(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21175385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LNG may still be the most cost-effective oral emergency contraception method.
    Pittrof R; Sauer U; Ikram P
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2011 Apr; 37(2):121-2; author reply 122-3. PubMed ID: 21454278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative cost effectiveness of Depo-Provera, Implanon, and Mirena in reversible long-term hormonal contraception in the UK.
    Varney SJ; Guest JF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(17):1141-51. PubMed ID: 15612832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.
    Mavranezouli I;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1338-45. PubMed ID: 18372257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ulipristal acetate: an emergency contraception extended to 5 days using a progesterone receptor modulator (Ellaone)].
    Gaspard U; Kridelka F
    Rev Med Liege; 2010 Dec; 65(12):700-5. PubMed ID: 21287767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adolescents and emergency contraception: update 2011.
    Duffy K; Gold MA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 23(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 21836502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: probably not.
    Raymond EG; Trussell J; Polis CB
    Contraception; 2013 Apr; 87(4):504. PubMed ID: 23290429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.