484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21067735)
1. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup.
Siersema PD; Rastogi A; Leufkens AM; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; DeMarco DC
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(26):3400-8. PubMed ID: 22807609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video).
Gralnek IM; Carr-Locke DL; Segol O; Halpern Z; Siersema PD; Sloyer A; Fenster J; Lewis BS; Santo E; Suissa A; Segev M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23410700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies.
Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.
Tribonias G; Theodoropoulou A; Konstantinidis K; Vardas E; Karmiris K; Chroniaris N; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.
Triadafilopoulos G; Li J
Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 18543136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Leung WK; Lo OS; Liu KS; Tong T; But DY; Lam FY; Hsu AS; Wong SY; Seto WK; Hung IF; Law WL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 109(6):855-63. PubMed ID: 24751581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
Rastogi A; Bansal A; Rao DS; Gupta N; Wani SB; Shipe T; Gaddam S; Singh V; Sharma P
Gut; 2012 Mar; 61(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 21997547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.
Keswani RN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21145054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study.
Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
