187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21067938)
1. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in image-guided cranio-maxillofacial surgery.
Zhang W; Wang C; Yu H; Liu Y; Shen G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 39(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 21067938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A region-based anatomical landmark configuration for sinus surgery using image guided navigation system: a phantom-study.
Ahmadian A; Fathi Kazerooni A; Mohagheghi S; Amini Khoiy K; Sadr Hosseini M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 24461706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental validation of predicted application accuracies for computer-assisted (CAS) intraoperative navigation with paired-point registration.
Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Mar; 13(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 28801767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fiducial markers configuration optimization in image-guided surgery.
Bao N; Chen Y; Yue Y; Li H; Cui Z; Zhuang J; Tian S; Kang Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3361-71. PubMed ID: 25227046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geometrical analysis of registration errors in point-based rigid-body registration using invariants.
Shamir RR; Joskowicz L
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 20800534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fiducial optimization for minimal target registration error in image-guided neurosurgery.
Shamir RR; Joskowicz L; Shoshan Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 22156977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probe versus microscope: a comparison of different methods for image-to-patient registration.
Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Diakov G; Jeleff O; Kral F; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1539-1548. PubMed ID: 29869745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimization of target registration error for vertebra in image-guided spine surgery.
Ershad M; Ahmadian A; Dadashi Serej N; Saberi H; Amini Khoiy K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 23820761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of two dental registration-splint techniques for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.
Venosta D; Sun Y; Matthews F; Kruse AL; Lanzer M; Gander T; Grätz KW; Lübbers HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 23835568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel device for preoperative registration and automatic tracking in cranio-maxillofacial image guided surgery.
Zhang W; Wang C; Shen G; Wang X; Cai M; Gui H; Liu Y; Yang D
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 22897358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in intraoperative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery.
Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3643-8. PubMed ID: 19163500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of image guided surgery based on cone beam computer tomography image data.
Eggers G; Senoo H; Kane G; Mühling J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):e41-8. PubMed ID: 19157914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy assessment of a marker-free method for registration of CT and stereo images applied in image-guided implantology: a phantom study.
Mohagheghi S; Ahmadian A; Yaghoobee S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 25441868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.
Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Template-based registration for image-guided maxillofacial surgery.
Eggers G; Mühling J; Marmulla R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1330-6. PubMed ID: 16122598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Fiducial Marker Number and Configuration on Registration Error in Dynamic Implant Surgery.
Shen Y; Tao B; Sun Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(4):727-732. PubMed ID: 37669525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.
Fitzpatrick JM; West JB; Maurer CR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 9874293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of fiducial distribution on headset-based registration in image-guided sinus surgery.
Knott PD; Maurer CR; Gallivan R; Roh HJ; Citardi MJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Nov; 131(5):666-72. PubMed ID: 15523446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device.
Seeberger R; Kane G; Hoffmann J; Eggers G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 40(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 21459015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study.
Kingma R; Rohling RN; Nguan C
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(2):54-70. PubMed ID: 21322745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
