These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21068039)

  • 1. The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 May; 278(1711):1595-600. PubMed ID: 21068039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formant-frequency variation and its effects on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():323-31. PubMed ID: 23716238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):680-91. PubMed ID: 25751040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informational masking of monaural target speech by a single contralateral formant.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2726-36. PubMed ID: 25994702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 13(2):269-280. PubMed ID: 22160754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Across-formant integration and speech intelligibility: Effects of acoustic source properties in the presence and absence of a contralateral interferer.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1227. PubMed ID: 27586751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral restoration of speech: intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps.
    Warren RM; Hainsworth KR; Brubaker BS; Bashford JA; Healy EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 9055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure.
    Gilbert G; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2438-44. PubMed ID: 16642856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.
    Souza P; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):792-805. PubMed ID: 19640044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative contributions of formants to the intelligibility of sine-wave sentences in Mandarin Chinese.
    Han Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL495. PubMed ID: 28618801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.