BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21068598)

  • 1. An analytic approach to double dosimetry algorithms in occupational dosimetry using energy dependent organ dose conversion coefficients.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 21068598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective dose estimation in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters: impact of the 2007 recommendations of the ICRP.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 18695415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac catheterization: impact of face and neck shielding on new estimates of effective dose.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 19901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A methodology to split the total cumulative Hp(10) dose into the Hp(10)
    Domienik J
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):N1-N4. PubMed ID: 27922829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective dose to staff from interventional procedures: estimations from single and double dosimetry.
    Kuipers G; Velders XL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 19689952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus.
    Chen J; Meyerhof D; Vlahovich S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters.
    Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of the new ICRP recommendations for aircrew dosimetry.
    Dietze G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Oct; 136(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 19638445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A phantom for effective dose measurement: organ dose distribution assessment based on a numerical approach.
    Furstoss C; Ménard S; Clairand I; Chau Q
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):180-4. PubMed ID: 17675663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radiation burden in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
    Selmaier M; Stillkrieg W; Müller RG; Hahn EG; Ell C
    Z Gastroenterol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):671-4. PubMed ID: 7871856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing doses to interventional radiologists using a personal dosimeter worn over a protective apron.
    Stranden E; Widmark A; Sekse T
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 18415785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of double dosimetry algorithms for estimating the effective dose in occupational dosimetry of interventional radiology staff.
    Järvinen H; Buls N; Clerinx P; Miljanic S; Nikodemová D; Ranogajec-Komor M; Struelens L; d'Errico F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 18757899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the new nuclear decay data of ICRP publication 107 on inhalation dose coefficients for workers.
    Manabe K; Endo A; Eckerman KF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 19914964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction factors applied to finger dosimetry: a theoretical assessment of appropriate values for use in handling radiopharmaceuticals.
    Sherbini S; Ilas D; Eckerman K; DeCicco J
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 21617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology: simulations.
    Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):36-8. PubMed ID: 18283062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.