354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21068680)
1. Surface electromyographic activation patterns and elbow joint motion during a pull-up, chin-up, or perfect-pullup™ rotational exercise.
Youdas JW; Amundson CL; Cicero KS; Hahn JJ; Harezlak DT; Hollman JH
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3404-14. PubMed ID: 21068680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of muscle-activation patterns during the conventional push-up and perfect· pushup™ exercises.
Youdas JW; Budach BD; Ellerbusch JV; Stucky CM; Wait KR; Hollman JH
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3352-62. PubMed ID: 20664364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic and electromyographic comparisons between chin-ups and lat-pull down exercises.
Doma K; Deakin GB; Ness KF
Sports Biomech; 2013 Sep; 12(3):302-13. PubMed ID: 24245055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of muscle activation levels during arm abduction in the plane of the scapula vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation upper extremity patterns.
Youdas JW; Arend DB; Exstrom JM; Helmus TJ; Rozeboom JD; Hollman JH
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1058-65. PubMed ID: 22446675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electromyographic analysis of muscle activation during pull-up variations.
Dickie JA; Faulkner JA; Barnes MJ; Lark SD
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Feb; 32():30-36. PubMed ID: 28011412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises.
Escamilla RF; Lewis C; Bell D; Bramblet G; Daffron J; Lambert S; Pecson A; Imamura R; Paulos L; Andrews JR
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):265-76. PubMed ID: 20436242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of interelectrode distance on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):482-95. PubMed ID: 15935960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective activation of the latissimus dorsi and the inferior fibers of trapezius at various shoulder angles during isometric pull-down exertion.
Park SY; Yoo WG
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Dec; 23(6):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24064179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Muscle activation levels of the gluteus maximus and medius during standing hip-joint strengthening exercises using elastic-tubing resistance.
Youdas JW; Adams KE; Bertucci JE; Brooks KJ; Nelson MM; Hollman JH
J Sport Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 23(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 23921445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An electromyographic assessment of the "bear hug": an examination for the evaluation of the subscapularis muscle.
Chao S; Thomas S; Yucha D; Kelly JD; Driban J; Swanik K
Arthroscopy; 2008 Nov; 24(11):1265-70. PubMed ID: 18971057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biceps Disorder Rehabilitation for the Athlete: A Continuum of Moderate- to High-Load Exercises.
Borms D; Ackerman I; Smets P; Van den Berge G; Cools AM
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):642-650. PubMed ID: 28125910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activation of Spinal Stabilizers and Shoulder Complex Muscles During an Inverted Row Using a Portable Pull-up Device and Body Weight Resistance.
Youdas JW; Keith JM; Nonn DE; Squires AC; Hollman JH
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jul; 30(7):1933-41. PubMed ID: 26422610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Muscular activities during sling- and ground-based push-up exercise.
Maeo S; Chou T; Yamamoto M; Kanehisa H
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Mar; 7():192. PubMed ID: 24678968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise.
Bazzucchi I; Sbriccoli P; Marzattinocci G; Felici F
Muscle Nerve; 2006 Feb; 33(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 16307438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shoulder muscle activation during stable and suspended push-ups at different heights in healthy subjects.
Borreani S; Calatayud J; Colado JC; Tella V; Moya-Nájera D; Martin F; Rogers ME
Phys Ther Sport; 2015 Aug; 16(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 25882770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An examination of innervation zone movement with increases in isometric torque production.
Defreitas JM; Costa PB; Ryan ED; Herda TJ; Cramer JT; Beck TW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2795-9. PubMed ID: 18996046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of EMG normalisation methods for upper-limb muscles.
Rota S; Rogowski I; Champely S; Hautier C
J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(15):1696-704. PubMed ID: 23697512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental muscle pain changes motor control strategies in dynamic contractions.
Ervilha UF; Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Graven-Nielsen T
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 15952017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electromyography of 3 scapular muscles: a comparative analysis of the cuff link device and a standard push-up.
Tucker WS; Campbell BM; Swartz EE; Armstrong CW
J Athl Train; 2008; 43(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 18833308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peak and average rectified EMG measures: which method of data reduction should be used for assessing core training exercises?
Hibbs AE; Thompson KG; French DN; Hodgson D; Spears IR
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Feb; 21(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 20655245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
