254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21068763)
1. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Zucchi A; Lazzeri M; Porena M; Mearini L; Costantini E
Nat Rev Urol; 2010 Nov; 7(11):626-33. PubMed ID: 21068763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
Homola Prokop; Hensel Germund; Košťál Milan
Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(3):200-204. PubMed ID: 34167313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system: The outcomes of 291 patients.
Chang CP; Hsu FK; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Lee NR; Lee HL; Horng HC; Wang PH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15086. PubMed ID: 30946362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.
Murphy AM; Goldman HB
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Apr; 24(4):529-30. PubMed ID: 23224021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Alas AN; Anger JT
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
