These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21068896)

  • 41. Signal-to-noise ratio for astronomical imaging by deconvolution from wave-front sensing.
    Roggemann MC; Welsh BM
    Appl Opt; 1994 Aug; 33(23):5400-14. PubMed ID: 20935931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stable fitting of 2D curves and 3D surfaces by implicit polynomials.
    Helzer A; Barzohar M; Malah D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2004 Oct; 26(10):1283-94. PubMed ID: 15641716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optical performance of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in the human eye.
    Ortiz D; Alió JL; Bernabéu G; Pongo V
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):755-62. PubMed ID: 18471629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Imaging performance analysis of adaptive optical telescopes using laser guide stars.
    Welsh BM
    Appl Opt; 1991 Dec; 30(34):5021-30. PubMed ID: 20717316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Joint influences of aerodynamic flow field and aerodynamic heating of the dome on imaging quality degradation of airborne optical systems.
    Xiao H; Zuo B; Tian Y; Zhang W; Hao C; Liu C; Li Q; Li F; Zhang L; Fan Z
    Appl Opt; 2012 Dec; 51(36):8625-36. PubMed ID: 23262604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance analysis of the self-referenced speckle-holography image-reconstruction technique.
    Welsh BM; Vonniederhausern RN
    Appl Opt; 1993 Sep; 32(26):5071-8. PubMed ID: 20856312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A new family of optical systems employing φ-polynomial surfaces.
    Fuerschbach K; Rolland JP; Thompson KP
    Opt Express; 2011 Oct; 19(22):21919-28. PubMed ID: 22109044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of lateral shearing interferograms by use of Zernike polynomials.
    Harbers G; Kunst PJ; Leibbrandt GW
    Appl Opt; 1996 Nov; 35(31):6162-72. PubMed ID: 21127635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Retrieval of wave aberration from point spread function or optical transfer function data.
    Maeda J; Murata K
    Appl Opt; 1981 Jan; 20(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 20309102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Zoom null lens.
    Shafer DR
    Appl Opt; 1979 Nov; 18(22):3863-5. PubMed ID: 20216708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Geometrical optical transfer function: is it worth calculating?
    Díaz JA; Mahajan VN
    Appl Opt; 2017 Oct; 56(28):7998-8004. PubMed ID: 29047789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Imaging performance of annular apertures. 6: Limitations by optical surface deviations.
    Tschunko HF
    Appl Opt; 1987 Dec; 26(24):5333-6. PubMed ID: 20523526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distorted wave front produced by a high-resolution projection optical system having rotationally symmetric birefringence.
    Unno Y
    Appl Opt; 1998 Nov; 37(31):7241-7. PubMed ID: 18301553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Laser detection of ultrasonic waves with concave portions of the wave fronts.
    Korkh Y; Perov D; Rinkevich A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2359-62. PubMed ID: 23143586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of nonuniform amplitude on the optical transfer function.
    Chung CS; Hopkins HH
    Appl Opt; 1989 Mar; 28(6):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20548647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Generalized wave-front reconstruction algorithm applied in a Shack-Hartmann Test.
    Zou W; Zhang Z
    Appl Opt; 2000 Jan; 39(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 18337893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurement of telescope aberrations through atmospheric turbulence by use of phase diversity.
    Baba N; Mutoh K
    Appl Opt; 2001 Feb; 40(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 18357030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A direct approach to the evaluation of the variance of the wave aberration.
    King WB
    Appl Opt; 1968 Mar; 7(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 20068620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Optical Interpretation of the Merit Function in Grey's Lens Design Program.
    Seppala LG
    Appl Opt; 1974 Mar; 13(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 20126041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Combined approach to the Hubble Space Telescope wave-front distortion analysis.
    Roddier C; Roddier F
    Appl Opt; 1993 Jun; 32(16):2992-3008. PubMed ID: 20829906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.