147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21069512)
1. [First experiments for the detection of simulated mammographic lesions: digital full field mammography with a new detector with a double plate of pure selenium].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Anders K; Uder M
Radiologe; 2011 Feb; 51(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 21069512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of dignity determination of mammographic microcalcification with two systems for digital full-field mammography with different detector resolution: a retrospective clinical study].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Adamietz B; Meier-Meitinger M; Wenkel E; Lell M; Anders K; Uder M
Radiologe; 2011 Feb; 51(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 21069511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.
Shen Y; Yi Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Liu X; You Z; Ge S; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6429-42. PubMed ID: 22149826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Berzeg S; Bick U; Fischer T; Hamm B
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 12811688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions in five different digital and one conventional mammography system].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Lell M; Böhner C; Wenkel E; Imhoff K; Schmid A; Krug B; Bautz W
Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 15346289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of detector uniformity issues for Siemens Inspiration systems.
Baldelli P; Keavey E; Manley M; Power G; Phelan N
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():262-268. PubMed ID: 31927263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photon counting computed tomography: concept and initial results.
Shikhaliev PM; Xu T; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 15789589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pilot Study on the Detection of Simulated Lesions Using a 2D and 3D Digital Full-Field Mammography System with a Newly Developed High Resolution Detector Based on Two Shifts of a-Se.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Bani M; Lux MP; Schwab S; Loehberg CR; Jud SM; Rauh C; Bayer CM; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Fasching PA; Adamietz B; Meier-Meitinger M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2012 May; 72(5):408-411. PubMed ID: 25298545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors.
Ghetti C; Borrini A; Ortenzia O; Rossi R; Ordóñez PL
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 18383665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
