104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21070437)
1. The necrosis sign in magnetic resonance-mammography: diagnostic accuracy in 1,084 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Breast J; 2010; 16(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 21070437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-Mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions.
Baltzer PA; Yang F; Dietzel M; Herzog A; Simon A; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Breast J; 2010; 16(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 20565468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis of breast lesions 5 mm or less: is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging?
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 20498554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The hook sign for differential diagnosis of malignant from benign lesions in magnetic resonance mammography: experience in a study of 1084 histologically verified cases.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 20092368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papillomas: typical findings and differential diagnosis.
Dietzel M; Kaiser C; Baltzer PA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 25423553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic comparison of two pulse sequences for edema assessment in MR-mammography.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Gajda ; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1500-3. PubMed ID: 21481556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is "prepectoral edema" a morphologic sign for malignant breast tumors?
Kaiser CG; Herold M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Krammer J; Gajda M; Camara O; Schoenberg SO; Kaiser WA; Wasser K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 25784323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of ductal obstruction sign in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions at MR imaging.
Baltzer PA; Kaiser CG; Dietzel M; Vag T; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):e18-21. PubMed ID: 19954911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Korean J Radiol; 2010; 11(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 20191065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined use of imaging and cytologic grading schemes for screen-detected breast abnormalities improves overall diagnostic accuracy.
Farshid G; Downey P
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):282-8. PubMed ID: 15999361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of chemical-shift MR imaging to differentiate between adrenal adenomas and non adenoma adrenal lesions.
Maurea S; Imbriaco M; D'Angelillo M; Mollica C; Camera L; Salvatore M
Radiol Med; 2006 Aug; 111(5):674-86. PubMed ID: 16791464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
