123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21070904)
21. Radiologists should read CT colonography.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Apr; 20(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 20451815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environment.
Burling D; Halligan S; Atchley J; Dhingsar R; Guest P; Hayward S; Higginson A; Jobling C; Kay C; Lilford R; Maskell G; McCafferty I; McGregor J; Morton D; Kumar Neelala M; Noakes M; Philips A; Riley P; Taylor A; Bassett P; Wardle J; Atkin W; Taylor SA
Clin Radiol; 2007 May; 62(5):424-9; discussion 430-1. PubMed ID: 17398266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fundamental elements for successful performance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).
Park SH; Yee J; Kim SH; Kim YH
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 17673837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of appendicular radiographic image interpretation by radiographers and junior doctors in Ghana: Can this be improved by training?
Ofori-Manteaw BB; Dzidzornu E
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):255-259. PubMed ID: 31301784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gastroenterologists' interpretation of CTC: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility and similar accuracy compared with radiologists' interpretation.
Young PE; Ray QP; Hwang I; Kikendall JW; Gentry AB; Skopic A; Cash BD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2926-31. PubMed ID: 19672252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Virtual colonoscopy training and accreditation: a national survey of radiologist experience and attitudes in the UK.
Burling D; Moore A; Taylor S; La Porte S; Marshall M
Clin Radiol; 2007 Jul; 62(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 17556034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: national survey of current practice.
Plumb AA; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Nickerson C; Patnick J
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 23245277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic accuracy of radiographer reporting of computed tomography colonography examinations: a systematic review.
Meertens R; Brealey S; Nightingale J; McCoubrie P
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):e177-90. PubMed ID: 23312673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance.
Burling D; Moore A; Marshall M; Weldon J; Gillen C; Baldwin R; Smith K; Pickhardt PJ; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 18374719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flat colon polyps: what should radiologists know?
Ignjatovic A; Burling D; Ilangovan R; Clark SK; Taylor SA; East JE; Saunders BP
Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):958-66. PubMed ID: 21070898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computed tomography colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in Israel: results of the National CT Colonography Survey of the Israeli Association of Abdominal Imaging and the Israeli Radiological Association.
Blachar A; Levy G; Graif M; Sosna J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Oct; 10(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 19009951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of focused training on abnormality detection and provision of accurate preliminary clinical evaluation in newly qualified radiographers.
Stevens BJ; Thompson JD
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 29306375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study.
Haycock AV; Youd P; Bassett P; Saunders BP; Tekkis P; Thomas-Gibson S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Nov; 70(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 19559433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 16498097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers.
Dachman AH; Kelly KB; Zintsmaster MP; Rana R; Khankari S; Novak JD; Ali AN; Qalbani A; Fletcher JG
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18796675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of a continuing medical education course to improve fellows' knowledge and skills in esophageal disorders.
Kim HC; Pandolfino JE; Komanduri S; Hirano I; Cohen ER; Wayne DB
Dis Esophagus; 2011 Aug; 24(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 21309911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
