These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21071602)

  • 1. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies.
    Voigt LF; Schwartz SM; Doody DR; Lee SC; Li CI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 173(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 21071602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness.
    Barr ML; van Ritten JJ; Steel DG; Thackway SV
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():177. PubMed ID: 23173849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of address-based sampling and random-digit dialing methods for recruiting young men as controls in a case-control study of testicular cancer susceptibility.
    Clagett B; Nathanson KL; Ciosek SL; McDermoth M; Vaughn DJ; Mitra N; Weiss A; Martonik R; Kanetsky PA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 178(11):1638-47. PubMed ID: 24008901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys.
    Lee S; Brick JM; Brown ER; Grant D
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):1121-39. PubMed ID: 20500221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a weighting strategy to include mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey using an overlapping dual-frame design with limited benchmark information.
    Barr ML; Ferguson RA; Hughes PJ; Steel DG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():102. PubMed ID: 25189826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the feasibility and sample quality of a national random-digit dialing cellular phone survey of young adults.
    Gundersen DA; ZuWallack RS; Dayton J; Echeverría SE; Delnevo CD
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 179(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 24100957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples.
    Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013.
    Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: challenges and practical solutions.
    McBride O; Morgan K; McGee H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22475155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effectiveness of Advance Letters for Cell Telephone Samples.
    Skalland B; Zhao Z; Jeyarajah J
    Proc Am Stat Assoc; 2014 May; 20(May 15-18 2014):. PubMed ID: 32322181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences Between Landline and Mobile Phone Users in Sexual Behavior Research.
    Badcock PB; Patrick K; Smith AMA; Simpson JM; Pennay D; Rissel CE; de Visser RO; Grulich AE; Richters J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Aug; 46(6):1711-1721. PubMed ID: 27671783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population.
    Shebl F; Poppell CE; Zhan M; Dwyer DM; Hopkins AB; Groves C; Reed F; Devadason C; Steinberger EK
    Public Health Rep; 2009; 124(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 19618786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moving towards a single-frame cell phone design in random digit dialing surveys: considerations from a French general population health survey.
    Soullier N; Legleye S; Richard JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):94. PubMed ID: 35369861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Potential selection bias in telephone surveys: landline and mobile phones].
    Garcia-Continente X; Pérez-Giménez A; López MJ; Nebot M
    Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 24300381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution.
    Blumberg SJ; Luke JV; Cynamon ML
    Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 16571707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers.
    Jackson AC; Pennay D; Dowling NA; Coles-Janess B; Christensen DR
    J Gambl Stud; 2014 Jun; 30(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 23288431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
    Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A feasibility study of cell phone and landline phone interviews for monitoring of risk and protection factors for chronic diseases in Brazil.
    Moura EC; Claro RM; Bernal R; Ribeiro J; Malta DC; Morais Neto O
    Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Feb; 27(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 21359464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage.
    Brogan DJ; Denniston MM; Liff JM; Flagg EW; Coates RJ; Brinton LA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 153(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11390332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.