126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21071850)
1. Comparative biochemical characterization of two GroEL homologs from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942.
Huq S; Sueoka K; Narumi S; Arisaka F; Nakamoto H
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem; 2010; 74(11):2273-80. PubMed ID: 21071850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. pH-mediated control of anti-aggregation activities of cyanobacterial and E. coli chaperonin GroELs.
Akter T; Nakamoto H
J Biochem; 2021 Apr; 169(3):351-361. PubMed ID: 32997746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-housekeeping, non-essential GroEL (chaperonin) has acquired novel structure and function beneficial under stress in cyanobacteria.
Nakamoto H; Kojima K
Physiol Plant; 2017 Nov; 161(3):296-310. PubMed ID: 28597961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cloning, characterization and functional analysis of groESL operon from thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus vulcanus.
Tanaka N; Hiyama T; Nakamoto H
Biochim Biophys Acta; 1997 Dec; 1343(2):335-48. PubMed ID: 9434123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular analysis of the multiple GroEL proteins of Chlamydiae.
Karunakaran KP; Noguchi Y; Read TD; Cherkasov A; Kwee J; Shen C; Nelson CC; Brunham RC
J Bacteriol; 2003 Mar; 185(6):1958-66. PubMed ID: 12618460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of Chaperonin Gene Duplication in Stigonematalean Cyanobacteria (Subsection V).
Weissenbach J; Ilhan J; Bogumil D; Hülter N; Stucken K; Dagan T
Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 9(1):241-252. PubMed ID: 28082600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expression and function of a groEL paralog in the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus under heat and cold stress.
Sato S; Ikeuchi M; Nakamoto H
FEBS Lett; 2008 Oct; 582(23-24):3389-95. PubMed ID: 18786533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanisms involved in the functional divergence of duplicated GroEL chaperonins in Myxococcus xanthus DK1622.
Wang Y; Zhang WY; Zhang Z; Li J; Li ZF; Tan ZG; Zhang TT; Wu ZH; Liu H; Li YZ
PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(2):e1003306. PubMed ID: 23437010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli.
Gupta P; Aggarwal N; Batra P; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2006; 38(11):1975-85. PubMed ID: 16822698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural and functional conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 Is a chaperonin.
Sielaff B; Lee KS; Tsai FT
J Mol Biol; 2011 Jan; 405(3):831-9. PubMed ID: 21094166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization.
Kumar CM; Khare G; Srikanth CV; Tyagi AK; Sardesai AA; Mande SC
J Bacteriol; 2009 Nov; 191(21):6525-38. PubMed ID: 19717599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Purification and characterization of Chromatium vinosum GroEL and GroES proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells lacking the endogenous groESL operon.
Dionisi HM; Viale AM
Protein Expr Purif; 1998 Nov; 14(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 9790891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Only one of five groEL genes is required for viability and successful symbiosis in Sinorhizobium meliloti.
Bittner AN; Foltz A; Oke V
J Bacteriol; 2007 Mar; 189(5):1884-9. PubMed ID: 17158666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Zhuo L; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Li J; Zhang XH; Li YZ
Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():733. PubMed ID: 28496436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of refolding activities between nanogel artificial chaperone and GroEL systems.
Asayama W; Sawada S; Taguchi H; Akiyoshi K
Int J Biol Macromol; 2008 Apr; 42(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18179818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cloning, characterization and functional analysis of groEL-like gene from thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus vulcanus, which does not form an operon with groES.
Furuki M; Tanaka N; Hiyama T; Nakamoto H
Biochim Biophys Acta; 1996 May; 1294(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 8645726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery and reuse of the molecular chaperone GroEL for in vitro protein refolding.
Guise AD; Chaudhuri JB
Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 9548790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties.
George R; Kelly SM; Price NC; Erbse A; Fisher M; Lund PA
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2004 Nov; 324(2):822-8. PubMed ID: 15474501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 69 kDa Escherichia coli maltodextrin glucosidase does not get encapsulated underneath GroES and folds through trans mechanism during GroEL/GroES-assisted folding.
Paul S; Singh C; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
FASEB J; 2007 Sep; 21(11):2874-85. PubMed ID: 17494995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional differences between cyanobacterial DnaK1 chaperones from the halophyte Aphanothece halophytica and the freshwater species Synechococcus elongatus expressed in Escherichia coli.
Blanco-Rivero MC; Takabe T; Viale AM
Curr Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 51(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 16059771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
