BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21074004)

  • 1. Taxing working memory reduces vividness and emotional intensity of images about the Queen's Day tragedy.
    Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA; Smeets MA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 42(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 21074004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye movements reduce vividness and emotionality of "flashforwards".
    Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA; Janssen WC; van der Beek J
    Behav Res Ther; 2010 May; 48(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 20129601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing vividness and emotional intensity of recurrent "flashforwards" by taxing working memory: an analogue study.
    Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA; Dek EC; Giele CL; van der Wielen JW; Reijnen MJ; van Roij B
    J Anxiety Disord; 2011 May; 25(4):599-603. PubMed ID: 21376527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EMDR and mindfulness. Eye movements and attentional breathing tax working memory and reduce vividness and emotionality of aversive ideation.
    van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM; Beetsma D; Slofstra C; Hornsveld H; Houtveen J; Leer A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 42(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 21570931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing the vividness and emotional impact of distressing autobiographical memories: the importance of modality-specific interference.
    Kemps E; Tiggemann M
    Memory; 2007 May; 15(4):412-22. PubMed ID: 17469020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-course of eye movement-related decrease in vividness and emotionality of unpleasant autobiographical memories.
    Smeets MA; Dijs MW; Pervan I; Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA
    Memory; 2012; 20(4):346-57. PubMed ID: 22537073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visuospatial working memory interference with recollections of trauma.
    Lilley SA; Andrade J; Turpin G; Sabin-Farrell R; Holmes EA
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2009 Sep; 48(Pt 3):309-21. PubMed ID: 19187579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blurring of emotional and non-emotional memories by taxing working memory during recall.
    van den Hout MA; Eidhof MB; Verboom J; Littel M; Engelhard IM
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(4):717-27. PubMed ID: 24199660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How eye movements in EMDR work: changes in memory vividness and emotionality.
    Leer A; Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2014 Sep; 45(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 24814304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EMDR: eye movements superior to beeps in taxing working memory and reducing vividness of recollections.
    van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM; Rijkeboer MM; Koekebakker J; Hornsveld H; Leer A; Toffolo MB; Akse N
    Behav Res Ther; 2011 Feb; 49(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 21147478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing negative autobiographical memories in the lab: a comparison of three eye-movement tasks.
    Mertens G; Krypotos AM; van Logtestijn A; Landkroon E; van Veen SC; Engelhard IM
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 30080475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence for the inverted U-Curve: More demanding dual tasks cause stronger aversive memory degradation.
    Littel M; van Schie K
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2019 Dec; 65():101484. PubMed ID: 31125845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How eye movements affect unpleasant memories: support for a working-memory account.
    Gunter RW; Bodner GE
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Aug; 46(8):913-31. PubMed ID: 18565493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of vividness and associated craving in personalized food imagery.
    McClelland A; Kemps E; Tiggemann M
    J Clin Psychol; 2006 Mar; 62(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 16299713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of the vividness of visual imagery: the effects of delayed recall, stimulus affect and individual differences.
    Bywaters M; Andrade J; Turpin G
    Memory; 2004 Jul; 12(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 15487543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating properties of imagery-induced flash-forwards and the effect of eye movements on the experience of desire and craving in gamers.
    Brandtner A; Pekal J; Brand M
    Addict Behav; 2020 Jun; 105():106347. PubMed ID: 32062335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative mental imagery in public speaking anxiety: Forming cognitive resistance by taxing visuospatial working memory.
    Homer SR; Deeprose C; Andrade J
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Mar; 50():77-82. PubMed ID: 26100455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample.
    Matthijssen SJMA; Brouwers T; van Roozendaal C; Vuister T; de Jongh A
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2021; 12(1):1956793. PubMed ID: 34567439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories.
    van Veen SC; van Schie K; Wijngaards-de Meij LD; Littel M; Engelhard IM; van den Hout MA
    Front Psychiatry; 2015; 6():45. PubMed ID: 25904871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of taxing working memory on negative and positive memories.
    Engelhard IM; van Uijen SL; van den Hout MA
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2010; 1():. PubMed ID: 22893797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.