These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21074138)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal Down syndrome screening strategies: should the combined test continue to be widely used?
    Gekas J; Durand A; Bujold E; Vallée M; Forest JC; Rousseau F; Reinharz D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 204(2):175.e1-8. PubMed ID: 21074138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Down syndrome screening paradigms.
    Caughey AB; Kaimal AJ; Odibo AO
    Clin Lab Med; 2010 Sep; 30(3):629-42. PubMed ID: 20638577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated, sequential, and contingent screening for Down syndrome - local needs should drive methodology.
    Wyatt P
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Feb; 27(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 17266162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential and contingent prenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Wald NJ; Rudnicka AR; Bestwick JP
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):769-77. PubMed ID: 16821246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening strategies for Down syndrome.
    Odibo AO; Stamilio DM; Nelson DB; Sehdev HM; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):562-8. PubMed ID: 16135588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for Down syndrome.
    Ball RH; Caughey AB; Malone FD; Nyberg DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Berkowitz RL; Gross SJ; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; Emig D; D'Alton ME;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 17601890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First trimester screening: economic implications.
    Macones GA; Odibo A
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 16104679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-trimester marker ratios in prenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP; Morris JK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jun; 26(6):514-23. PubMed ID: 16739232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years.
    Biggio JR; Morris TC; Owen J; Stringer JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 15042005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness model for first-trimester versus second-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome.
    Kott B; Dubinsky TJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jun; 1(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 17411619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contingent triple-screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester is not a cost-effective prenatal screening strategy in Mainland Chinese population.
    Li DZ
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 May; 30(5):493. PubMed ID: 20440741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal Down syndrome screening: a cost effectiveness analysis of alternative screening programs.
    Cusick W; Vintzileos AM
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 10582856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of observed versus hypothesized service utilization on the incremental cost of first trimester screening and prenatal diagnosis for trisomy 21 in a Canadian province.
    Metcalfe A; Currie G; Johnson JA; Bernier F; Lix LM; Lyon AW; Tough SC
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 May; 33(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 23519599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome in Australia: costs and benefits of current and novel screening strategies.
    O'Leary P; Maxwell S; Murch A; Hendrie D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Oct; 53(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 24090461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First- and second-trimester Down syndrome screening: current strategies and clinical guidelines.
    Shaw SW; Hsu JJ; Lee CN; Hsiao CH; Chen CP; Hsieh TT; Cheng PJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 47(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18603499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in state/population-based Down syndrome screening and invasive prenatal testing with the introduction of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening, South Australia, 1995-2005.
    Muller PR; Cocciolone R; Haan EA; Wilkinson C; Scott H; Sage L; Bird R; Hutchinson R; Chan A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):315.e1-7; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 17403402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Truncation limits for CT marker ratios in prenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP; Morris JK
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Feb; 27(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 17266161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First-trimester Down syndrome screening in women younger than 35 years old and cost-effectiveness analysis in Taiwan population.
    Chou CY; Hsieh FJ; Cheong ML; Lee FK; She BQ; Tsai MS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 15(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19811590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.