These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21074198)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
    Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of outpatient narcotic prescribing patterns after minimally invasive versus retropubic and perineal radical prostatectomy.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Weinburg AC; Gu X; Yu HY; Lipsitz SR; Williams SB; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21944990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.
    Ulmer WD; Prasad SM; Kowalczyk KJ; Gu X; Dodgion C; Lipsitz S; Palapattu GS; Choueiri TK; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 22818134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.
    Hu JC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Barry MJ; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(14):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19826025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.
    Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC
    Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Retropubic and perineal approach: plea for perineal radical prostatectomy].
    Salomon L; Colombel M; Patard JJ; Contremoulins I; Bellot J; Lefrére-Belda MA; Gasman D; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 1997 Dec; 7(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 9490143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population.
    Bishoff JT; Motley G; Optenberg SA; Stein CR; Moon KA; Browning SM; Sabanegh E; Foley JP; Thompson IM
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 9679897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Cimen HI; Altinova S; Balbay MD
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):351; author reply 351-2. PubMed ID: 21664338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Radical perineal prostatectomy--surgical technique, first results].
    Mshvildadze ShT; Udzhmadzhuridze AN; Managadze GL; Shtakl' V
    Georgian Med News; 2007 Feb; (143):58-63. PubMed ID: 17404442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men within managed care insurance plans.
    Shih YC; Ward JF; Pettaway CA; Xu Y; Matin SF; Davis JW; Thompson BP; Elting LS
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22433769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radical perineal prostatectomy].
    Petrov SB; Korol' VD
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2005; 164(6):78-81. PubMed ID: 16792322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy: updated technique and results.
    LaFontaine P; Chan D; Partin AW; Gurganus R; Hortopan SC; Marshall FF
    Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10719926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
    Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. S. M. Prasad, X. Gu, R. Lavelle, S. R. Lipsitz and J. C. Hu J Urol 2011; 185: 111-115.
    Blitz BF; Schwartz BN
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):350-1; author reply 351. PubMed ID: 21600598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.