254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21074557)
1. Evaluation of lumbosacral nerve root conduction in chickens by electrophysiological testing including high-resolution spinal magnetic stimulation.
Bader SR; Fischer A; Emrich D; Juetting U; Weyh T; Kaspers B; Matiasek K
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Jan; 194(2):342-9. PubMed ID: 21074557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials.
Jou IM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 14722405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic lumbosacral motor root stimulation with a flat, large round coil.
Matsumoto H; Octaviana F; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Yugeta A; Hamada M; Inomata-Terada S; Nakatani-Enomoto S; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 19231278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of conduction velocities of nerve fibers to smaller and larger muscles in rats.
Oğuzhanoğlu A; Erdoğan C; Tabak E; Cenikli U
Int J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 120(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 20128676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically-elicited electromyography, and evoked EMG to assess nerve root function during sustained retraction in a porcine model.
Lyon R; Lieberman JA; Feiner J; Burch S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E558-64. PubMed ID: 19770598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A methodological reappraisal of non invasive high voltage electrical stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots.
Troni W; Di Sapio A; Berra E; Duca S; Merola A; Sperli F; Bertolotto A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Oct; 122(10):2071-80. PubMed ID: 21458371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiologic characteristics of tibial and sciatic nerves in the hen.
Robertson DG; Anderson RJ
Am J Vet Res; 1986 Jun; 47(6):1378-81. PubMed ID: 3014930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Motor potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation--a tool for objective assessment of motor conduction along the spinal cord and its roots].
Chistyakov AV; Soustiel JF; Hafner H; Feinsod M
Harefuah; 1996 Jan; 130(1):1-4, 72. PubMed ID: 8682369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative electrophysiologic studies on the functions of nerve roots involved in cervical dumbbell-shaped schwannoma and their clinical utility.
Kaneko K; Kato Y; Kojima T; Imajyo Y; Taguchi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Dec; 19(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 17146300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motor conduction time along the cauda equina in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Senocak O; Hürel DM; Sener U; Uğurel B; Oztura I; Ertekin C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1410-4. PubMed ID: 19478662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the fastest regenerating motor and sensory myelinated axons in the same peripheral nerve.
Moldovan M; Sørensen J; Krarup C
Brain; 2006 Sep; 129(Pt 9):2471-83. PubMed ID: 16905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Backfiring" in spinal cord monitoring. High thoracic spinal cord stimulation evokes sciatic response by antidromic sensory pathway conduction, not motor tract conduction.
Su CF; Haghighi SS; Oro JJ; Gaines RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 May; 17(5):504-8. PubMed ID: 1621148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motor nerve conduction velocity in normal chickens.
Kornegay JN; Gorgacz EJ; Parker MA; Schierman LW
Am J Vet Res; 1983 Aug; 44(8):1537-40. PubMed ID: 6625304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interest of peripheral anesthetic blocks as a diagnosis and prognosis tool in patients with spastic equinus foot: a clinical and electrophysiological study of the effects of block of nerve branches to the triceps surae muscle.
Buffenoir K; Decq P; Lefaucheur JP
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1596-600. PubMed ID: 15905125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the paradoxical stage of neural cathodal parabiosis (the reciprocal inhibition of adjacent fibers)].
Matiushkin DP; Kubasov IV
Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1984 Oct; 70(10):1409-15. PubMed ID: 6334620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tibial motor nerve conduction studies: an investigation into the mechanism for amplitude drop of the proximal evoked response.
Barkhaus PE; Kincaid JC; Nandedkar SD
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Nov; 44(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 22006693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conduction velocity changes along lumbar primary afferent fibers in cats.
Rindos AJ; Loeb GE; Levitan H
Exp Neurol; 1984 Nov; 86(2):208-26. PubMed ID: 6489495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensory testing of distal sural and posterior tibial nerves provides early prediction of surgical anesthesia after single-injection infragluteal-parabiceps sciatic nerve block.
Nader A; Doty R; Brodskaia A; Kendall MC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):951-7. PubMed ID: 20007732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial regeneration of the sciatic nerve in rats enhances motor excitability to magnetic stimulation.
Kraus KH; Welch JA; Levy WJ; Gugino VD; Wells MR
Exp Neurol; 1997 Jan; 143(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9000442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Physiological approach to peripheral neuropathy. Conventional nerve conduction studies and magnetic motor root stimulation].
Ugawa Y
Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 2004 Nov; 44(11):986-90. PubMed ID: 15651350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
