173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21076210)
21. Total concentrations and fractions of Cd, Cr, Pb, Cu, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants.
Wang C; Hu X; Chen ML; Wu YH
J Hazard Mater; 2005 Mar; 119(1-3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15752872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Energy benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: the importance of site operation and layout.
Belloir C; Stanford C; Soares A
Environ Technol; 2015; 36(1-4):260-9. PubMed ID: 25413121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sludge thermal oxidation processes: mineral recycling, energy impact, and greenhouse effect gases release.
Guibelin E
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(10):209-16. PubMed ID: 15259957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benchmarking the sustainability of sludge handling systems in small wastewater treatment plants.
Archer G; Jin C; Parker W
J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 256():109893. PubMed ID: 31822457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs.
Flores-Alsina X; Arnell M; Amerlinck Y; Corominas L; Gernaey KV; Guo L; Lindblom E; Nopens I; Porro J; Shaw A; Snip L; Vanrolleghem PA; Jeppsson U
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():616-24. PubMed ID: 23959217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment.
Remy C; Lesjean B; Waschnewski J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 23128622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with other organic wastes in small wastewater treatment plants: an economic considerations evaluation.
Pavan P; Bolzonella D; Battistoni E; Cecchi F
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):45-53. PubMed ID: 18048976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation.
Hutnan M; Drtil M; Kalina A
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Apr; 131(1-3):163-9. PubMed ID: 16297548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Energy self-sufficient sewage wastewater treatment plants: is optimized anaerobic sludge digestion the key?
Jenicek P; Kutil J; Benes O; Todt V; Zabranska J; Dohanyos M
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(8):1739-44. PubMed ID: 24185054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Benchmarking of large municipal wastewater treatment plants treating over 100,000 PE in Austria.
Lindtner S; Schaar H; Kroiss H
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 18520003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pre-nitrification by encapsulated nitrifiers--a possibility for self-sufficient energy operation of domestic WWTPs.
Sievers M; Vorlop KD; Hahne J; Schlieker M; Schäfer S
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):173-80. PubMed ID: 12906287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
Ekama GA
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pitfalls in international benchmarking of energy intensity across wastewater treatment utilities.
Walker NL; Williams AP; Styles D
J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113613. PubMed ID: 34560465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities.
Hillman T; Ramaswami A
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 20136120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility study for co-digestion of sewage sludge with OFMSW on two wastewater treatment plants in Germany.
Krupp M; Schubert J; Widmann R
Waste Manag; 2005; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 15869982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anaerobic digestion as a sustainable solution for biosolids management by the Montreal metropolitan community.
Frigon JC; Guiot SR
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):561-6. PubMed ID: 16180478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Operating costs and energy demand of wastewater treatment plants in Austria: benchmarking results of the last 10 years.
Haslinger J; Lindtner S; Krampe J
Water Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 74(11):2620-2626. PubMed ID: 27973366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions by the wastewater treatment plant of a locomotive repair factory in China.
Wei Y; Yerushalmi L; Haghighat F
Water Environ Res; 2008 Dec; 80(12):2253-60. PubMed ID: 19146103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China.
Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Techno-economical efficiency and productivity change of wastewater treatment plants: the role of internal and external factors.
Hernández-Sancho F; Molinos-Senante M; Sala-Garrido R
J Environ Monit; 2011 Dec; 13(12):3448-59. PubMed ID: 22037729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
