BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21076216)

  • 1. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 20732705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2061-72. PubMed ID: 18207487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A parsimonious dynamic model for river water quality assessment.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):607-18. PubMed ID: 20150696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20418636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards quantification of uncertainty in predicting water quality failures in integrated catchment model studies.
    Schellart AN; Tait SJ; Ashley RM
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3893-904. PubMed ID: 20569964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urban water quality modelling: a parsimonious holistic approach for a complex real case study.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):521-36. PubMed ID: 20107280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sediment and pollutant load modelling using an integrated urban drainage modelling toolbox: an application of City Drain.
    Rodríguez JP; Achleitner S; Möderl M; Rauch W; Maksimović C; McIntyre N; Díaz-Granados MA; Rodríguez MS
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2273-82. PubMed ID: 20418624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency analysis of river water quality using integrated urban wastewater models.
    Fu G; Butler D
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(12):2112-7. PubMed ID: 22643404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated modelling under uncertainty in watershed-level assessment and management.
    Ham JH; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Jang JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):31-9. PubMed ID: 17978430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model reduction through boundary relocation to facilitate real-time control optimisation in the integrated urban wastewater system.
    Meirlaen J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):373-81. PubMed ID: 11936656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parameter optimisation of real-time control strategies for urban wastewater systems.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 11385840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1617-29. PubMed ID: 20351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated modelling concept for immission-based management of sewer system, wastewater treatment plant and river.
    Erbe V; Schütze M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):95-103. PubMed ID: 16248185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hydrodynamic water quality model for propagation of pollutants in rivers.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 20651432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wet weather water quality modelling of a Portuguese urban catchment: difficulties and benefits.
    David LM; Matos RS
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11902464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated modelling as an analytical and optimisation tool for urban watershed management.
    Erbe V; Frehmann T; Geiger WF; Krebs P; Londong J; Rosenwinkel KH; Seggelke K
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):141-50. PubMed ID: 12380985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of new developments on river water quality from an integrated system modelling perspective.
    Fu G; Butler D; Khu ST
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(4):1257-67. PubMed ID: 19036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.