These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21076651)

  • 1. THE IMPACT OF FALLIBLE ITEM PARAMETER ESTIMATES ON LATENT TRAIT RECOVERY.
    Cheng Y; Yuan KH
    Psychometrika; 2010 Jun; 75(2):280-291. PubMed ID: 21076651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.
    Feuerstahler LM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-375. PubMed ID: 30034054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parameter Recovery in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Under Complexity and Nonnormality.
    Svetina D; Valdivia A; Underhill S; Dai S; Wang X
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):530-544. PubMed ID: 29881104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent
    Dimitrov DM; Atanasov DV
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):388-404. PubMed ID: 37929260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
    Wang C; Xu G; Zhang X
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 31183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Sample Size and Various Other Factors on Estimation of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 83(3):520-555. PubMed ID: 37187690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):275-304. PubMed ID: 29795914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Short Note on Obtaining Point Estimates of the IRT Ability Parameter With MCMC Estimation in Mplus: How Many Plausible Values Are Needed?
    Luo Y; Dimitrov DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 30911193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of Adaptive Measurement of Change to Item Parameter Estimation Error.
    Cooperman AW; Weiss DJ; Wang C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):643-677. PubMed ID: 35754618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm for estimating Ramsay-curve three-parameter normal ogive model with non-normal latent trait distributions.
    Cui Y; Lu J; Zhang J; Shi N; Liu J; Meng X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():971126. PubMed ID: 36506999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.
    Chen Y; Li X; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):538-562. PubMed ID: 29532405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditional Precision of Measurement for Test Scores: Are Conditional Standard Errors Sufficient?
    Nicewander WA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 30636779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Two Methods for Computing IRT Scores From the Number-Correct Score.
    Nicewander WA; Schulz EM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):643-655. PubMed ID: 29882547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.