These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21077720)

  • 21. Cognitive load reduces visual identity negative priming by disabling the retrieval of task-inappropriate prime information: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Stahl J
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1330():101-13. PubMed ID: 20233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jan; 45(1):272-83. PubMed ID: 19210008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnitude of negative priming varies with conceptual task difficulty: attentional resources are involved in episodic retrieval processes.
    von Hecker U; Conway M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):666-78. PubMed ID: 19606402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Negative priming with numbers: no evidence for a semantic locus.
    Lammertyn J; Fias W
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Oct; 58(7):1153-72. PubMed ID: 16194953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semantic priming effects from single words in a lexical decision task.
    Noguera C; Ortells JJ; Abad MJ; Carmona E; Daza MT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 16950164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition.
    McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 19948108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the control of single-prime negative priming: the effects of practice and time course.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 19686021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Negative priming in naming of categorically related objects: an fMRI study.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Pringle AJ
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):881-9. PubMed ID: 18489967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Event-related brain potential correlates of identity negative priming from overlapping pictures.
    Behrendt J; Gibbons H; Schrobsdorff H; Ihrke M; Herrmann JM; Hasselhorn M
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):921-30. PubMed ID: 20230496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping.
    Yeh YY; Chao HF
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 15129743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Affective matching moderates S-R binding.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 21432676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Frings C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology.
    Olivers CN; Hickey C
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1362-71. PubMed ID: 19962396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mask- and distractor-triggered inhibitory processes in the priming of motor responses: an EEG study.
    Jaśkowski P; Białuńska A; Tomanek M; Verleger R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):70-85. PubMed ID: 17887961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.