618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21078915)
1. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts.
Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M
West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work.
Crookes PA; Reis SL; Jones SC
Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Jul; 30(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 19906469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Getting published in peer-reviewed journals.
Dimitroulis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 22142552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
Kearney MH; Freda MC
Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
Pendlebury DA
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
Flanagin A
Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
Katz A
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The journal impact factor: how to interpret its true value and importance.
Grzybowski A
Med Sci Monit; 2009 Feb; 15(2):SR1-4. PubMed ID: 19179983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication opportunities in nonnursing journals.
Polit DF; Northam S
Nurse Educ; 2010; 35(6):237-42. PubMed ID: 20975407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.
Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty M
J Prof Nurs; 2009; 25(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 19306833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
