These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21079201)

  • 1. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience.
    Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. T1-weighted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a dual-echo Dixon technique at 3 T.
    Dogan BE; Ma J; Hwang K; Liu P; Yang WT
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):842-51. PubMed ID: 21769987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pelvic imaging using a T1W fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique at 3T.
    Cornfeld DM; Israel G; McCarthy SM; Weinreb JC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18581401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience.
    Willinek WA; Gieseke J; Kukuk GM; Nelles M; König R; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Träber F; Thomas D; Kuhl CK; Schild HH
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 20720078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
    Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique improves fat suppression in breast MRI.
    Le-Petross H; Kundra V; Szklaruk J; Wei W; Hortobagyi GN; Ma J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):889-94. PubMed ID: 20373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast spin-echo triple-echo Dixon: initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for fat-suppressed T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging.
    Low RN; Ma J; Panchal N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 19711403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
    Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: LAVA-Flex compared with conventional fat suppression T1-weighted images.
    Li XH; Zhu J; Zhang XM; Ji YF; Chen TW; Huang XH; Yang L; Zeng NL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24222639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Water/fat-resolved whole-heart Dixon coronary MRA: an initial comparison.
    Börnert P; Koken P; Nehrke K; Eggers H; Ostendorf P
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 23400853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI.
    Ma J; Vu AT; Son JB; Choi H; Hazle JD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jan; 23(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 16315212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using a phantom to compare MR techniques for determining the ratio of intraabdominal to subcutaneous adipose tissue.
    Donnelly LF; O'Brien KJ; Dardzinski BJ; Poe SA; Bean JA; Holland SK; Daniels SR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):993-8. PubMed ID: 12646443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression.
    Soyer P; Le Normand S; de Givry SC; Gueye C; Somveille E; Scherrer A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 8623633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing T1-weighted and T2-weighted three-point Dixon technique with conventional T1-weighted fat-saturation and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) techniques for the study of the lumbar spine in a short-bore MRI machine.
    Brandão S; Seixas D; Ayres-Basto M; Castro S; Neto J; Martins C; Ferreira JC; Parada F
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):e617-23. PubMed ID: 23932678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fat-suppressed, three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging using high-acceleration parallel acquisition and a dual-echo Dixon technique for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI at 3 T.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Yu MH; Kim EJ; Han JK; Choi BI
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1454-62. PubMed ID: 25480475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
    Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.