These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21080671)

  • 1. U.S. EPA regulation of plant-incorporated protectants: assessment of impacts of gene flow from pest-resistant plants.
    Wozniak CA; Martinez JC
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5859-64. PubMed ID: 21080671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions.
    Culleen LE
    Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulatory oversight of biochemical pesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: health effects considerations.
    McClintock JT; Kough JL; Sjoblad RD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 8159811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FIFRA-88, GLP, and QA: pesticide registration.
    Sterner RT; Fagerstone KA
    Qual Assur; 1997; 5(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 9509549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plant fitness assessment for wild relatives of insect resistant crops.
    Letourneau DK; Hagen JA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 19419653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.
    Fenner-Crisp PA
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):199-200. PubMed ID: 8672877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops.
    Warwick SI; Beckie HJ; Hall LM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():72-99. PubMed ID: 19566704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review.
    Cerdeira AL; Duke SO
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1633-58. PubMed ID: 16899736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
    Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of hybrids between weedy rice and insect-resistant transgenic rice under field experiments: implication for environmental biosafety assessment.
    Cao QJ; Xia H; Yang X; Lu BR
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2009 Dec; 51(12):1138-48. PubMed ID: 20021561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study.
    Légère A
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 15593291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic and ecological consequences of transgene flow to the wild flora.
    Felber F; Kozlowski G; Arrigo N; Guadagnuolo R
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():173-205. PubMed ID: 17522826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Worker exposure studies.
    Dow MI
    Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 7804648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aggregate exposures under the Food Quality Protection Act: An approach using chlorpyrifos.
    Shurdut BA; Barraj L; Francis M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 9927565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. EPA oversight of pesticide traits in genetically modified plants and recent biotechnology innovation efforts.
    Mendelsohn M; Pierce AA; Striegel W
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1126006. PubMed ID: 36909391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transgenes and national boundaries - The need for international regulation.
    Bagavathiannan M; Van Acker R
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 20028616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating genetic containment strategies for transgenic plants.
    Lee D; Natesan E
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 16460821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the use of transgenic plants diminish or promote biodiversity?
    Raven PH
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 20678596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.