These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21080769)
41. Psychiatric decision-making for the courts: judges, psychiatrists, lay people? Jackson MW Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(4):507-20. PubMed ID: 3583530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Different penal systems and some consequences for forensic psychiatry. Beyaert FH Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):425-9. PubMed ID: 7184885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Modernization of a mental health act: I. Commitment patterns. Munetz MR; Kaufman KR; Rich CL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 7225591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The right to community treatment for mentally disordered sex offenders. Cornwell JK Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(4):1213-32. PubMed ID: 15619795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR]. Friemert K Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An HIV-infected psychiatric patient: some clinicolegal dilemmas. Silva JA; Leong GB; Weinstock R Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 2706332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Risk communication in sexually violent predator hearings. Scott S; Gilcrist B; Thurston N; Huss MT Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):322-36. PubMed ID: 19908210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem. Zemishlany Z; Melamed Y Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8. PubMed ID: 17294980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. From whom will we be protected? Comparative approaches to the assessment of dangerousness. Pfohl SJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 489188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Declining interest in forensic psychiatry: recent developments in Denmark. Svendsen BB Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 912116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle". Gutheil TG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The psychiatric evaluation of dangerousness in two trial court jurisdictions. Forst ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 912126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The ethical practice of forensic psychiatry: a view from the trenches. Ciccone JR; Clements CD Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 6478069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluations of dangerousness. Kress F Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The madness of Mental Health Acts. Ellard J Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1990 Jun; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 2396960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]