These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21081019)

  • 1. Protection of human participants in health research - a comparison of some US Federal Regulations and South African Research Ethics guidelines.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Wassenaar D
    S Afr Med J; 2010 Nov; 100(11):712-6. PubMed ID: 21081019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?
    De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
    McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the institutional review board in the oversight of the ethical aspects of human studies research.
    Cseko GC; Tremaine WJ
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Apr; 28(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 23447409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.
    Vaslef SN; Cairns CB; Falletta JM
    Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. PubMed ID: 17043281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
    Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical Conduct of Research in Children: Pediatricians and Their IRB (Part 2 of 2).
    Rose CD
    Pediatrics; 2017 Jun; 139(6):. PubMed ID: 28562269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
    Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
    de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inconsistencies in institutional review board decisions: A proposal to regulate the decision-making process.
    Ekmekci PE; Guner MD
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2019; 120(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 30793611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
    Jansson RL
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revamping the US Federal Common Rule: Modernizing Human Participant Research Regulations.
    Hodge JG; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2017 Apr; 317(15):1521-1522. PubMed ID: 28241195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications?
    Weil E; Nelson RM; Ross LF
    Pediatrics; 2002 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):364-70. PubMed ID: 12165592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.