These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21081188)

  • 21. The pathomechanics of osteoporoses.
    Frost HM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Nov; (200):198-225. PubMed ID: 3905111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screws in normal and osteoporotic bone material.
    Battula S; Schoenfeld A; Vrabec G; Njus GO
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 16500737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of local cellular deformation in bone--influence of microstructure dimensions.
    Apostolopoulos CA; Deligianni DD
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2009; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 19516085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Postfailure modulus strongly affects microcracking and mechanical property change in human iliac cancellous bone: a study using a 2D nonlinear finite element method.
    Wang X; Zauel RR; Fyhrie DP
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2654-8. PubMed ID: 18672244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trabecular bone tissue strains in the healthy and osteoporotic human femur.
    Van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R; Eckstein F; Rüegsegger P
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1781-8. PubMed ID: 14584888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Micromechanics fracture in osteonal cortical bone: a study of the interactions between microcrack propagation, microstructure and the material properties.
    Najafi AR; Arshi AR; Eslami MR; Fariborz S; Moeinzadeh MH
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2788-95. PubMed ID: 17376454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation.
    Zhang L; Yang G; Wu L; Yu B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Feb; 25(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 19917516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation.
    Diamant I; Shahar R; Masharawi Y; Gefen A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Mar; 22(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 17134802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical evaluation by patient-specific finite element analyses demonstrates therapeutic effects for osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Tawara D; Sakamoto J; Murakami H; Kawahara N; Oda J; Tomita K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jan; 3(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19878900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis.
    Nazarian A; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Müller R; Snyder BD
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Dec; 83(6):368-79. PubMed ID: 18946628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic short crack growth in cortical bone.
    Hazenberg JG; Taylor D; Lee TC
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):393-402. PubMed ID: 17065760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longitudinal analysis of mesenchymal progenitors and bone quality in the stem cell antigen-1-null osteoporotic mouse.
    Holmes C; Khan TS; Owen C; Ciliberti N; Grynpas MD; Stanford WL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Sep; 22(9):1373-86. PubMed ID: 17547535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of different shaped osteocyte lacunae on microcrack initiation and propagation.
    Ji C; Zhang L; Wang Y; Lin B; Bai X; Yun S; He B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Aug; 108():106072. PubMed ID: 37611387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The microscopic morphology of fluoride-induced bone.
    Vigorita VJ; Suda MK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983; (177):274-82. PubMed ID: 6407795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of trabecular bone microarchitecture and remodeling in glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Dalle Carbonare L; Arlot ME; Chavassieux PM; Roux JP; Portero NR; Meunier PJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Jan; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11149495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss.
    Parfitt AM; Mathews CH; Villanueva AR; Kleerekoper M; Frame B; Rao DS
    J Clin Invest; 1983 Oct; 72(4):1396-409. PubMed ID: 6630513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of mineralization and organic matrix in the microhardness of bone tissue from controls and osteoporotic patients.
    Boivin G; Bala Y; Doublier A; Farlay D; Ste-Marie LG; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
    Bone; 2008 Sep; 43(3):532-8. PubMed ID: 18599391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Different gene expression patterns in the bone tissue of aging postmenopausal osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women.
    Balla B; Kósa JP; Kiss J; Borsy A; Podani J; Takács I; Lazáry A; Nagy Z; Bácsi K; Speer G; Orosz L; Lakatos P
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Jan; 82(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 18074071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation.
    Ruimerman R; Hilbers P; van Rietbergen B; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):931-41. PubMed ID: 15713314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis.
    Li B; Aspden RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Apr; 12(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 9101376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.