These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21081600)
1. Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial. van Rooyen S; Delamothe T; Evans SJ BMJ; 2010 Nov; 341():c5729. PubMed ID: 21081600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Black N; Smith R BMJ; 1999 Jan; 318(7175):23-7. PubMed ID: 9872878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports. Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Shattell MM; Chinn P; Thomas SP; Cowling WR J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20487187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? Black N; van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Smith R; Evans S JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 9676665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. Fisher M; Friedman SB; Strauss B JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 8015127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial. John LK; Loewenstein G; Marder A; Callaham ML BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l5896. PubMed ID: 31694810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial. Cobo E; Cortés J; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Selva-O'Callaghan A; Kostov B; García L; Cirugeda L; Altman DG; González JA; Sànchez JA; Miras F; Urrutia A; Fonollosa V; Rey-Joly C; Vilardell M BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d6783. PubMed ID: 22108262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 9676666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers. Price A; Schroter S; Clarke M; McAneney H BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021753. PubMed ID: 30249629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal. Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study. Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. Van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N J Gen Intern Med; 1999 Oct; 14(10):622-4. PubMed ID: 10571708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities. Williams WA; Garvey KL; Goodman DM; Lauderdale DS; Ross LF J Pediatr; 2018 Sep; 200():254-260.e1. PubMed ID: 30029860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]