These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21081890)

  • 41. Analysis of precision in tumor tracking based on optical positioning system during radiotherapy.
    Zhou H; Shen J; Li B; Chen J; Zhu X; Ge Y; Wang Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 24(3):443-55. PubMed ID: 27257880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator for stereotactic radiosurgery with circular cone collimators.
    Zhang M; Fan Q; Lei Y; Thapa B; Padula G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 31904001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study.
    Olch AJ; Alaei P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 22(2):85-89. PubMed ID: 33450139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.
    Bissonnette JP; Moseley D; White E; Sharpe M; Purdie T; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 18406939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Monte Carlo study to investigate the feasibility of an on-board SPECT/spectral-CT/CBCT imager for medical linear accelerator.
    Wang H; Nie K; Chang J; Kuang Y
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5112-5122. PubMed ID: 32681649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accuracy evaluation of the optical surface monitoring system on EDGE linear accelerator in a phantom study.
    Mancosu P; Fogliata A; Stravato A; Tomatis S; Cozzi L; Scorsetti M
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26994827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the RUBY modular QA phantom for planar and non-coplanar VMAT and stereotactic radiations.
    Poppinga D; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Meyners J; Poppe B; Looe HK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 21(10):69-79. PubMed ID: 32797670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An improved method for evaluating LINAC isocenter.
    Zacharopoulos NG; Fenyes DA
    Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2672-2682. PubMed ID: 36896920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. EXACTRAC x-ray and beam isocenters-what's the difference?
    Tideman Arp D; Carl J
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1418-23. PubMed ID: 22380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A quality assurance program for image quality of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.
    Bissonnette JP; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1807-15. PubMed ID: 18561655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Megavoltage planar and cone-beam imaging with low-Z targets: dependence of image quality improvement on beam energy and patient separation.
    Robar JL; Connell T; Huang W; Kelly RG
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3955-63. PubMed ID: 19810468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study.
    Ayan AS; Kim G; Whitaker M; Al-Hallaq H; Hsu SH; Woollard J; Roberts DA; Shtraus N; Gao S; Gupta N; Moran JM
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Oct; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34544065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Should image rotation be addressed during routine cone-beam CT quality assurance?
    Ayan AS; Lin H; Yeager C; Deville C; McDonough J; Zhu TC; Anderson N; Bar Ad V; Lu HM; Both S
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):1059-73. PubMed ID: 23363650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. SU-E-J-33: Geometric Agreement Check for Imaging System with Radiation Beam by KV and MV-CBCT.
    Saotome N; Kida S; Haga A; Masutani Y; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3659. PubMed ID: 28517564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical commissioning of a new patient positioning system, SyncTraX FX4, for intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.
    Tanabe S; Umetsu O; Sasage T; Utsunomiya S; Kuwabara R; Kuribayashi T; Takatou H; Kawaguchi G; Aoyama H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):149-158. PubMed ID: 30273444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and Longitudinal Analysis of Plan-Based Streamlined Quality Assurance on Multiple Positioning Guidance Systems With Single Phantom Setup.
    Zhou S; Li J; Du Y; Yu S; Wang M; Wu H; Yue H
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():683733. PubMed ID: 34222005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Image quality of 4D in-treatment CBCT acquired during lung SBRT using FFF beam: a phantom study.
    Kim J; Keum KC; Lee H; Hong CS; Park K; Kim JS
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Sep; 15(1):224. PubMed ID: 32977808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC): OBI X-ray tube alignment procedure.
    Barnes MP; Pomare D; Menk FW; Moraro B; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):68-78. PubMed ID: 30178521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.