These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21082048)

  • 1. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.
    Lee CK; Park JY; Zhang HY
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2010 Sep; 48(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 21082048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of minimally invasive using a tubular retraction system versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases].
    Luo Z; Rao H; Huang D; Li G; Liu C; Dong S; Tian J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 95(33):2681-5. PubMed ID: 26711822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
    Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.
    Huang P; Wang Y; Xu J; Xiao B; Liu J; Che L; Mao K
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Jul; 12(1):117. PubMed ID: 28728587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of contoured versus straight rod on clinical outcomes and sagittal parameters in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) at L4/5 level-more than 5 years follow-up.
    Zhao Y; Jia J; Liu W; Chen X; Mai R; Tian Y; Zhao J; Liu X
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jan; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 30929967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.
    Wu J; Zhang C; Lu K; Li C; Zhou Y
    Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E587-E599. PubMed ID: 31775412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.