These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21083057)

  • 1. Review of the 2008 European Medicines Agency concept paper on bioanalytical method validation.
    Smith G
    Bioanalysis; 2009 Aug; 1(5):877-81. PubMed ID: 21083057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2009 White Paper on recent issues in regulated bioanalysis from the 3rd Calibration and Validation Group Workshop.
    Savoie N; Garofolo F; van Amsterdam P; Booth BP; Fast DM; Lindsay M; Lowes S; Masse R; Mawer L; Ormsby E; Phull R; Rocci ML; Vallano PT; Yin X
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Jan; 2(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 21083120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations on ISR in multi analyte assays, QA/bioanalytical consultants and GCP by Global CRO Council for Bioanalysis (GCC).
    Sangster T; Maltas J; Struwe P; Hillier J; Boterman M; Doig M; Breda M; Garofolo F; Caturla MC; Couerbe P; Schiebl C; Pattison C; Goodwin L; Segers R; Garofolo W; Folguera L; Zimmer D; Zimmerman T; Pawula M; Tang D; Cox C; Bigogno C; Schoutsen D; de Boer T; Green R; Houghton R; Sable R; Siethoff C; Harter T; Best S;
    Bioanalysis; 2012 Jul; 4(14):1723-30. PubMed ID: 22877218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aspects of bioanalytical method validation for the quantitative determination of trace elements.
    Levine KE; Tudan C; Grohse PM; Weber FX; Levine MA; Kim YS
    Bioanalysis; 2011 Aug; 3(15):1699-712. PubMed ID: 21827269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Request for global harmonization of the guidance for Bioanalytical Method Validation and sample analysis.
    Timmerman P; Lowes S; Fast DM; Garofolo F
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Apr; 2(4):683. PubMed ID: 21083261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative assessment of bioanalytical method validation guidelines for pharmaceutical industry.
    Kadian N; Raju KS; Rashid M; Malik MY; Taneja I; Wahajuddin M
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2016 Jul; 126():83-97. PubMed ID: 27179186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European Bioanalysis Forum and the way forward towards harmonized regulations.
    Lausecker B; van Amsterdam P; Brudny-Kloeppel M; Luedtke S; Timmerman P
    Bioanalysis; 2009 Aug; 1(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 21083056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European Medicines Agency guideline on bioanalytical method validation: what more is there to say?
    Smith G
    Bioanalysis; 2012 May; 4(8):865-8. PubMed ID: 22533559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of various international guidelines for analytical method validation.
    Chandran S; Singh RS
    Pharmazie; 2007 Jan; 62(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 17294806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EBF recommendation on the validation of bioanalytical methods for dried blood spots.
    Timmerman P; White S; Globig S; Lüdtke S; Brunet L; Smeraglia J
    Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(14):1567-75. PubMed ID: 21749218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Key elements of bioanalytical method validation for small molecules.
    Bansal S; DeStefano A
    AAPS J; 2007 Mar; 9(1):E109-14. PubMed ID: 17408234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulatory observations in bioanalytical determinations.
    Viswanathan CT
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Jul; 2(7):1325-9. PubMed ID: 21083243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Building the Global Bioanalysis Consortium - working towards a functional globally acceptable and harmonized guideline on bioanalytical method validation.
    van Amsterdam P; Arnold M; Bansal S; Fast D; Garofolo F; Lowes S; Timmerman P; Woolf E
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Nov; 2(11):1801-3. PubMed ID: 21083486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the bioanalytical community ready to revise the use of certain validation concepts and nomenclature?
    Olsson AO; Liljeblad M; Nilsson LB; Silvester S
    Bioanalysis; 2012 Jul; 4(14):1705-8. PubMed ID: 22877214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in the European communities toward developing analytical methods for regulating animal drugs and feed additives.
    Somogyi A
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1978 Sep; 61(5):1198-1200. PubMed ID: 721732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International harmonization of bioanalytical guidance.
    Bansal SK; Arnold M; Garofolo F
    Bioanalysis; 2010 Apr; 2(4):685-7. PubMed ID: 21083262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Justifying the lack of incurred sample reproducibility in a study: considerations and strategies.
    Gagnon-Carignan S; Lachance S; Saint-Laurent A; Gendron M; Lévesque A
    Bioanalysis; 2015; 7(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 25587838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of capability indices in the framework of analytical methods validation.
    Bouabidi A; Ziemons E; Marini R; Hubert C; Talbi M; Bouklouze A; Bourichi H; El Karbane M; Boulanger B; Hubert P; Rozet E
    Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Feb; 714():47-56. PubMed ID: 22244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulated drug bioanalysis for human pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug management.
    Huang Y; Shi R; Gee W; Bonderud R
    Bioanalysis; 2012 Aug; 4(15):1919-31. PubMed ID: 22943622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incurred sample reanalysis: a global transformation.
    Viswanathan CT
    Bioanalysis; 2011 Dec; 3(23):2601-2. PubMed ID: 22136048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.