191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21084416)
1. Mock trial at 2009 RSNA annual meeting: Jury exonerates radiologist for failure to communicate abnormal finding--but...
Berlin L
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):836-45. PubMed ID: 21084416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic messaging system for communicating important, but nonemergent, abnormal imaging results.
Eisenberg RL; Yamada K; Yam CS; Spirn PW; Kruskal JB
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):724-31. PubMed ID: 20884911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standards for radiology interpretation and reporting in the emergency setting.
Berlin L
Pediatr Radiol; 2008 Nov; 38 Suppl 4():S639-44. PubMed ID: 18810407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Will Saying "I'm Sorry" Prevent a Malpractice Lawsuit?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 16794148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist's duty?
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 11906852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using an automated coding and review process to communicate critical radiologic findings: one way to skin a cat.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):840-3. PubMed ID: 16177397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The deep pocket.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 11044015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Communication of the significant but not urgent finding.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 9016199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication.
Cascade PN; Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1439-42. PubMed ID: 10584778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiology reports.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):943-6. PubMed ID: 9308440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Clinical and Medicolegal Implications of Radiology Results Communication.
Aryal B; Khorsand DA; Dubinsky TJ
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(5):287-289. PubMed ID: 29122395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply?
Hoffman NY; Janus J; Destounis S; Logan-Young W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):597-9. PubMed ID: 8109504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medico-legal issues in radiological consultation.
Mozumdar BC; Jones G
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 14603592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Radiological Society of North America 86th scientific assembly and annual meeting Sunday, November 26 to Friday, December 1, 2000 McCormick place, Chicago, Illinois.
Maynard CD
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):327-9. PubMed ID: 10924548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Liability ... review of radiology-related malpractice claims.
Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(12):32. PubMed ID: 9217479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Communication of the urgent finding.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):513-5. PubMed ID: 8623618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The perils of communicating the unexpected finding.
Raskin MM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Oct; 7(10):791-5. PubMed ID: 20889109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transmission of nonemergent critical findings: communication versus consultation.
Baker SR
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):609-11. PubMed ID: 21084411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: What is “reasonable assurance of receipt?”.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):W159. PubMed ID: 23789690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts.
Spring DB; Tennenhouse DJ
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):811-4. PubMed ID: 3704163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
