129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21084910)
1. In vivo assessment of coronary stents with 64-row multidetector computed tomography: analysis of metal artifacts.
Papini GD; Casolo F; Di Leo G; Briganti S; Fantoni C; Medda M; Inglese L; De Ambroggi L; Sardanelli F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):921-6. PubMed ID: 21084910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.
Oncel D; Oncel G; Karaca M
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 17255411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: source and predictors of image distortion.
Halon DA; Gaspar T; Adawi S; Peled N; Lewis BS
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17707094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Chabbert V; Carrie D; Bennaceur M; Maupas E; Lauwers V; Mhem M; Lhermusier T; Elbaz M; Joffre F; Rousseau H; Puel J
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1452-63. PubMed ID: 17115159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.
Kefer JM; Coche E; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 16733682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.
Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M
Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography.
Kitagawa T; Fujii T; Tomohiro Y; Maeda K; Kobayashi M; Kunita E; Sekiguchi Y
Int J Cardiol; 2006 May; 109(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 16019087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between four-slice computed tomography and coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary stents.
Mazzarotto P; Di Renzi P; Paluello GM; Carunchio A; Ricci R; Molisso A; Ceci V; Indolfi C
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 May; 7(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 16645410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.
Rist C; von Ziegler F; Nikolaou K; Kirchin MA; Wintersperger BJ; Johnson TR; Knez A; Leber AW; Reiser MF; Becker CR
Acad Radiol; 2006 Dec; 13(12):1465-73. PubMed ID: 17138114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.
Manghat N; Van Lingen R; Hewson P; Syed F; Kakani N; Cox I; Roobottom C; Morgan-Hughes G
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18489934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.
Schuijf JD; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Warda HM; Vliegen HW; de Roos A; van der Wall EE
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15325923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography.
Maintz D; Grude M; Fallenberg EM; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 14616203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Rixe J; Achenbach S; Ropers D; Baum U; Kuettner A; Ropers U; Bautz W; Daniel WG; Anders K
Eur Heart J; 2006 Nov; 27(21):2567-72. PubMed ID: 17035252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of coronary stents using 40-detector row CT: comparison with 16-detector row CT in vitro.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Vembar M; Kaminaga T; Takei R; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Aizawa T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):910-6. PubMed ID: 18043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography.
Nieman K; Cademartiri F; Raaijmakers R; Pattynama P; de Feyter P
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 12669227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Visualization of the intra-stent lumen in the coronary arteries and detection of restenoses with 64-slices tomography scanners with cardiac synchronization: first experience].
Larchez C; Daoud B; Ghostine S; Caussin C; Lancelin B; Paul JF
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2006 Dec; 99(12):1184-90. PubMed ID: 18942519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.
Oncel D; Oncel G; Tastan A; Tamci B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18562725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
