These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21085712)
1. Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. Donegan S; Williamson P; Gamble C; Tudur-Smith C PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e11054. PubMed ID: 21085712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Glenny AM; Altman DG; Song F; Sakarovitch C; Deeks JJ; D'Amico R; Bradburn M; Eastwood AJ; Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jul; 9(26):1-134, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16014203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. Song F; Loke YK; Walsh T; Glenny AM; Eastwood AJ; Altman DG BMJ; 2009 Apr; 338():b1147. PubMed ID: 19346285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. Song F; Altman DG; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ BMJ; 2003 Mar; 326(7387):472. PubMed ID: 12609941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Indirect comparisons of therapeutic interventions. Schöttker B; Lühmann D; Boulkhemair D; Raspe H GMS Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jul; 5():Doc09. PubMed ID: 21289896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Edwards SJ; Clarke MJ; Wordsworth S; Borrill J Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 63(6):841-54. PubMed ID: 19490195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Picot J; Jones J; Colquitt JL; Gospodarevskaya E; Loveman E; Baxter L; Clegg AJ Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19726018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; You JJ; Akl EA; Mejza F; Bala MM; Bassler D; Mertz D; Diaz-Granados N; Vandvik PO; Malaga G; Srinathan SK; Dahm P; Johnston BC; Alonso-Coello P; Hassouneh B; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Bhatnagar N; Altman DG; Guyatt GH BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e1553. PubMed ID: 22422832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis. Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study. Song F; Xiong T; Parekh-Bhurke S; Loke YK; Sutton AJ; Eastwood AJ; Holland R; Chen YF; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ; Altman DG BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4909. PubMed ID: 21846695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overall similarity and consistency assessment scores are not sufficiently accurate for predicting discrepancy between direct and indirect comparison estimates. Xiong T; Parekh-Bhurke S; Loke YK; Abdelhamid A; Sutton AJ; Eastwood AJ; Holland R; Chen YF; Walsh T; Glenny AM; Song F J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 66(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 23186991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data. Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Soobiah C; Elliott MJ; Tricco AC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():47. PubMed ID: 27116943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies. Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer. Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals. Parent N; Hanley JA Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]