239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21085984)
21. Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.
Milanese N; Iani C; Rubichi S
Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20381024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.
Iani C; Anelli F; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97991. PubMed ID: 24897120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
van der Weiden A; Aarts H; Prikken M; van Haren NE
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. You Are Right!
Dittrich K; Puffe L; Klauer KC
Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):406-412. PubMed ID: 29268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?
Liepelt R; Raab M
Psychol Res; 2021 Oct; 85(7):2769-2781. PubMed ID: 33225385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.
Michel R; Bölte J; Liepelt R
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():674. PubMed ID: 29867651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial Response Discrimination May Elicit a Simon Effect on a Non-Complementary Task.
Lam MY; Chua R
Percept Mot Skills; 2024 Feb; 131(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 38009872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.
Baess P; Prinz W
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 233(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25224703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Excluded but not alone. Does social exclusion prevent the occurrence of a Joint Simon Effect (JSE)?
Walter J; Buon M; Glaviaux B; Brunel L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103337. PubMed ID: 34091392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contextual determinants of the social-transfer-of-learning effect.
Milanese N; Iani C; Sebanz N; Rubichi S
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):415-22. PubMed ID: 21512798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Human cortical activities during Go/NoGo tasks with opposite motor control paradigms.
Yamanaka K; Kimura T; Miyazaki M; Kawashima N; Nozaki D; Nakazawa K; Yano H; Yamamoto Y
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Feb; 142(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 11819037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dynamic structure of joint-action stimulus-response activity.
Malone M; Castillo RD; Kloos H; Holden JG; Richardson MJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89032. PubMed ID: 24558467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: comparison of effects in a Relevant Stimulus-Response Compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task.
Field M; Caren R; Fernie G; De Houwer J
Psychol Addict Behav; 2011 Dec; 25(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 21534644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
