These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21086218)

  • 1. Inferring social attributes from different face regions: evidence for holistic processing.
    Santos IM; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 21086218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing the socially relevant parts of faces.
    Benuzzi F; Pugnaghi M; Meletti S; Lui F; Serafini M; Baraldi P; Nichelli P
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Oct; 74(5):344-56. PubMed ID: 17845909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG.
    Lee LC; Andrews TJ; Johnson SJ; Woods W; Gouws A; Green GG; Young AW
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):477-90. PubMed ID: 19833143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: how positive congruency effects can be reversed.
    Ricciardelli P; Driver J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):491-504. PubMed ID: 17853198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.
    Loffler G; Gordon GE; Wilkinson F; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2287-97. PubMed ID: 15924942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios.
    Little AC; Roberts SC; Jones BC; Debruine LM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2018-32. PubMed ID: 22650610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal faces for gender and expression: a new technique for measuring dynamic templates used in face perception.
    Poirier FJ; Faubert J
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid communication: Global-local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces.
    Srinivasan N; Gupta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 21347993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orbitofrontal cortex lesions result in abnormal social judgements to emotional faces.
    Willis ML; Palermo R; Burke D; McGrillen K; Miller L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2182-7. PubMed ID: 20399220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does it matter where we meet? The role of emotional context in evaluative first impressions.
    Koji S; Fernandes M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 20565176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The context effect in face matching: Effects of feedback.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(19):2121-31. PubMed ID: 21854801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sad people avoid the eyes or happy people focus on the eyes? Mood induction affects facial feature discrimination.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    Br J Psychol; 2011 May; 102(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 21492145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable roles of the human somatosensory and superior temporal cortices for processing social face signals.
    Pourtois G; Sander D; Andres M; Grandjean D; Reveret L; Olivier E; Vuilleumier P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 20(12):3507-15. PubMed ID: 15610183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?
    Shore DM; Heerey EA
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 23887150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm.
    Borgmann K; Fugelsang J; Ansari D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21668091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
    Godard O; Fiori N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.