These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21086654)

  • 21. Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of automatic speech recognition.
    Schuster M; Maier A; Haderlein T; Nkenke E; Wohlleben U; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Nöth E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1741-7. PubMed ID: 16814875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of speech intelligibility after a secondary dehiscence operation using an artificial graft in patients with speech disorders after partial glossectomy.
    Terai H; Shimahara M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 15121261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A simple audiometry test of speech intelligibility in background noise].
    Garin P; Galle C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 12723485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Speech evaluation.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Lybolt J; Kent RD; Peters J
    ASHA Monogr; 1986 Mar; (23):24-31. PubMed ID: 3730028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [From intelligibility to comprehension, which measurement in practice?].
    Woisard V; Espesser R; Ghio A; Duez D
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2013; 134(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 24494329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vocal tract steadiness: a measure of phonatory and upper airway motor control during phonation in dysarthria.
    Zwirner P; Barnes GJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 1405531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear implantation in children with cerebral palsy. A preliminary report.
    Bacciu A; Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Ormitti F; Di Lella F; Guida M; Berghenti M; Bacciu S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May; 73(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 19201488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech and voice outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer and evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life speech domain.
    Thomas L; Jones TM; Tandon S; Carding P; Lowe D; Rogers S
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 19260883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
    Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Pennington L; Miller N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 May; 21(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 17468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Application of automatic speech recognition to quantitative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech with different signal quality.
    Haderlein T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Toy H; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Hornegger J; Rosanowski F
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19122460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring up to speech intelligibility.
    Miller N
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(6):601-12. PubMed ID: 24119170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of speech intelligibility in children with tongue-tie.
    Dollberg S; Manor Y; Makai E; Botzer E
    Acta Paediatr; 2011 Sep; 100(9):e125-7. PubMed ID: 21401716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and validation of first-ever speech-specific perceptual speech evaluation tool for patients with head and neck cancer: the London speech evaluation (LSE) scale.
    Dwivedi RC; Rose SS; Chisholm EJ; Kerawala CJ; Clarke PM; Nutting CM; Rhys-Evans PH; Harrington KJ; Kazi R
    Head Neck; 2012 Jan; 34(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 21469245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors influencing intelligibility and severity of chronic speech disorders of patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
    Balaguer M; Boisguerin A; Galtier A; Gaillard N; Puech M; Woisard V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1767-1774. PubMed ID: 30919058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Construction and use of a bite-block for the evaluation and treatment of speech disorders.
    Netsell R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 3974205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.