146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21088089)
1. Population exposure to ionising radiation from CT examinations in Aosta Valley between 2001 and 2008.
Catuzzo P; Aimonetto S; Zenone F; Fanelli G; Marchisio P; Meloni T; Pasquino M; Tofani S
Br J Radiol; 2010 Dec; 83(996):1042-51. PubMed ID: 21088089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia.
Yates SJ; Pike LC; Goldstone KE
Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):472-8. PubMed ID: 15151967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009.
Zenone F; Aimonetto S; Catuzzo P; Peruzzo Cornetto A; Marchisio P; Natrella M; Rosanò AM; Meloni T; Pasquino M; Tofani S
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):e330-8. PubMed ID: 21937611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A contribution to the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT.
Hatziioannou K; Papanastassiou E; Delichas M; Bousbouras P
Br J Radiol; 2003 Aug; 76(908):541-5. PubMed ID: 12893696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Romanian medical exposure to ionising radiation in 2012.
Girjoaba O; Cucu A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):137-40. PubMed ID: 25848102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical analysis for obtaining optimum number of CT scanners in patient dose surveys for determining national diagnostic reference levels.
Sohrabi M; Parsi M; Hariri Tabrizi S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):168-175. PubMed ID: 29955947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variations in radiation dose between the same model of multislice CT scanner at different hospitals.
Koller CJ; Eatough JP; Bettridge A
Br J Radiol; 2003 Nov; 76(911):798-802. PubMed ID: 14623781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values.
Järvinen H; Seuri R; Kortesniemi M; Lajunen A; Hallinen E; Savikurki-Heikkilä P; Laarne P; Perhomaa M; Tyrväinen E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):86-90. PubMed ID: 25833898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paediatric CT exposures: comparison between CTDI vol and SSDE methods using measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Figueira C; Di Maria S; Baptista M; Mendes M; Madeira P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):210-5. PubMed ID: 25883302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT radiation dose and image quality.
Payne JT
Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality and patient dose in computed tomography examinations in Greece.
Simantirakis G; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Dimitriou P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):129-32. PubMed ID: 21743078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multislice scanners and radiation dose.
Mahesh M; Hevezi JM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19179243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Multislice CT in a diagnostic imaging department: radiation doses delivered in 1 year.].
Salmerón I; Calzado A; Ruiz-López L; Alonso V; Cordeiro C; Fraile E
Radiologia; 2009; 51(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 19269658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical approach to the first iteration in the optimization of radiation dose and image quality in CT: estimates of the collective dose savings achieved.
Crawley MT; Booth A; Wainwright A
Br J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 74(883):607-14. PubMed ID: 11509396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of patient exposure in computerised tomogram in Poland.
Staniszewska MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 12120672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for contemporary CT.
Jansen JT; Shrimpton PC
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):5356-77. PubMed ID: 27362736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
