These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2109000)
1. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Svanberg M; Krasse B; Ornerfeldt HO Caries Res; 1990; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study. Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Forss H; Jokinen J; Spets-Happonen S; Seppä L; Luoma H Caries Res; 1991; 25(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 1810658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results. Hung TW; Richardson AS J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Presence of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in saliva and on enamel, glass ionomer cement, and composite resin surfaces. van Dijken J; Persson S; Sjöström S Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Feb; 99(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 2047748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Svanberg M Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study. Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite. van Dijken JW; Kalfas S; Litra V; Oliveby A Caries Res; 1997; 31(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 9286522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of chlorhexidine treatment followed by stannous fluoride gel application on mutans streptococci in margins of restorations. Wallman C; Krasse B; Birkhed D Caries Res; 1994; 28(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 7850847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials. Mjör IA; Jokstad A J Dent; 1993 Dec; 21(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 8258583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Jagadish S; Yogesh BG Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Salivary levels of mutans streptococci associated with restorations: a case-control study. Petti S; Campus G; Lumbau A; Tarsitani G New Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 24(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 11497086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]